ArticleScientific reports2025
An 8-point scale lung ultrasound scoring network fusing local detail and global features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Manual lung ultrasound (LUS) scoring is influenced by clinicians' subjective interpretation, leading to potential inconsistencies and misdiagnoses due to varying levels of experience. To improve monitoring of pulmonary ventilation and support early diagnosis, we propose an automated LUS scoring network based on an 8-point scale, named the detailed-global fusion residual network (DGF-ResNet). This network combines local and global features using the hybrid feature fusion Block, which includes the detail feature extraction (DFE) and global feature extraction (GFE) Modules. The DFE module employs a local channel and spatial attention mechanism to capture fine details, while the GFE Module utilizes a three-order recursive gated convolution and a global channel and spatial attention mechanism to extract global features. Experimental results on the FCSPF-13324 dataset from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University show that DGF-ResNet outperforms VGG16, ResNet50, and Vision Transformer in accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Specifically, DGF-ResNet improves over Vision Transformer by 7.05, 4.52, and 5.89 percentage points, over VGG16 by 3.06, 4.37, and 3.8 points, and over ResNet50 by 2.05, 4.26, and 3.34 points, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.