ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting preterm birth using machine learning methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning to predict adverse perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- High-throughput analysis of multimodal monitoring data: the role of machine learning in early warning systems for high-risk neonates.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in preterm birth prediction: a narrative review of current approaches and clinical applicability.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2026Review
- Comparative machine learning models for early prediction of preterm birth from maternal serum biomarkers.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Predicting the risk of preterm birth with machine learning and electronic health records in China.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Progesterone regulation of cervix ripening in preterm and term birth in mice.Reproduction (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- Review
- Artificial intelligence driven platform for rapid catalytic performance assessment of nanozymes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Blood-based predictive biomarkers for preterm birth: Redefining risk stratification in modern perinatal care.Tzu chi medical journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preterm birth is a significant public health concern, given its correlation with neonatal mortality and morbidity. The aetiology of preterm birth is complex and multifactorial. The objective of this study was to develop and compare machine learning models for predicting the risk of preterm birth. Data were collected from 50 patients in a maternity ward, with an analysis performed based on the timing of delivery (preterm vs. term). The applicability of XGBoost, CatBoost, logistic regression, support vector machines (SVM), and decision trees for predicting preterm delivery was evaluated through training. The linear SVM with boosted parameters demonstrated the highest performance, achieving an accuracy of 82%, precision of 83%, recall of 86%, and an F1-score of 84%. The logistic regression model, also boosted, demonstrated comparable performance to the linear SVM, with similar accuracy (80%), precision (82%), recall (82%), and F1-score (82%). The performance of other models, including decision trees and more complex algorithms, was inferior, which is likely attributable to the limited dataset and the number of parameters involved. In particular, machine learning models, most notably the linear SVM, can be effectively employed to assess the risk of preterm birth. The findings indicate that the linear SVM model exhibits the greatest efficacy among the tested models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.