Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39956843›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Predicting preterm birth using machine learning methods.

Anna Kloska, Alicja Harmoza, Sylwester M Kloska, Tomasz Marciniak, Iwona Sadowska-Krawczenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna Kloska *Faculty of Medicine, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 85796, Bydgoszcz, Poland. anna.kloska@pbs.edu.pl.
Alicja Harmoza *Faculty of Medicine, The Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, 85067, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Sylwester M KloskaFaculty of Medicine, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 85796, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Tomasz MarciniakFaculty of Telecommunications, Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 85796, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Iwona Sadowska-KrawczenkoFaculty of Medicine, The Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, 85067, Bydgoszcz, Poland.

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju POWR.03.02.00-00-I019/16-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preterm birth is a significant public health concern, given its correlation with neonatal mortality and morbidity. The aetiology of preterm birth is complex and multifactorial. The objective of this study was to develop and compare machine learning models for predicting the risk of preterm birth. Data were collected from 50 patients in a maternity ward, with an analysis performed based on the timing of delivery (preterm vs. term). The applicability of XGBoost, CatBoost, logistic regression, support vector machines (SVM), and decision trees for predicting preterm delivery was evaluated through training. The linear SVM with boosted parameters demonstrated the highest performance, achieving an accuracy of 82%, precision of 83%, recall of 86%, and an F1-score of 84%. The logistic regression model, also boosted, demonstrated comparable performance to the linear SVM, with similar accuracy (80%), precision (82%), recall (82%), and F1-score (82%). The performance of other models, including decision trees and more complex algorithms, was inferior, which is likely attributable to the limited dataset and the number of parameters involved. In particular, machine learning models, most notably the linear SVM, can be effectively employed to assess the risk of preterm birth. The findings indicate that the linear SVM model exhibits the greatest efficacy among the tested models.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPremature BirthAdultAlgorithmsDecision TreesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsPregnancySupport Vector MachineMachine learningPreterm birthPreterm deliverySupport vector machinesSVM

Identifiers

PMID39956843
PMCPMC11830770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.