Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39956833›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

RNA-protein interaction prediction using network-guided deep learning.

Haoquan Liu, Yiren Jian, Chen Zeng, Yunjie Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Technical review of artificial intelligence in TCR-T therapy.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haoquan LiuInstitute of Biophysics and Department of Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Yiren JianDepartment of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7199-9450
Chen ZengDepartment of Physics, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7778-6388
Yunjie ZhaoInstitute of Biophysics and Department of Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China. yjzhaowh@ccnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5256-9456

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 12175081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate computational determination of RNA-protein interactions remains challenging, particularly when encountering unknown RNAs and proteins. The limited number of RNAs and their flexibility constrained the effectiveness of the deep-learning models for RNA-protein interaction prediction. Here, we introduce ZHMolGraph, which integrates graph neural network and unsupervised large language models to predict RNA-protein interaction. We validate ZHMolGraph predictions on two benchmark datasets and outperform the current best methods. For the dataset of entirely unknown RNAs and proteins, ZHMolGraph shows an improvement in achieving high AUROC of 79.8% and AUPRC of 82.0%. This represents a substantial improvement of 7.1%-28.7% in AUROC and 4.6%-30.0% in AUPRC over other methods. We utilize ZHMolGraph to enhance the challenging SARS-CoV-2 RPI and unbound RNA-protein complex predictions. Such enhancements make ZHMolGraph a reliable option for genome-wide RNA-protein prediction. ZHMolGraph holds broad potential for modeling and designing RNA-protein complexes.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDeep LearningRNARNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, ViralCOVID-19HumansNeural Networks, ComputerSARS-CoV-2RNARNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID39956833
PMCPMC11830795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.