Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39956802›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An evolutionary prediction model for enterprise basic research based on knowledge graph.

Diao Haican, Zhang Yanqun, Xu Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diao HaicanInstitute of Quantitative and Technological Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, 100732, China. dhc_330@163.com.
Zhang YanqunInstitute of Quantitative and Technological Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, 100732, China.
Xu ChenBGRIMM Technology Group, Beijing, 100160, China. xc1994@pku.edu.cn.

Funding

Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) 'Peak Strategy' Funding Program in Quantitative Economics DF2023YS29Laboratory of Economic Big Data and Policy Evaluation, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, China 2024SYZH004National Natural Science Foundation of China 71991475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, China's enterprise basic research faces problems due to a need for more systematic guidance and dispersed themes. The construction of an enterprise basic research knowledge graph is of great practical significance for tracking the frontier technology of enterprises and playing the leading role of enterprise innovation. By constructing enterprise basic research dataset and mining the intrinsic correlation between data, the paper proposes a multilayer CNN-BiLSTM-based enterprise basic research evolutionary prediction model, and inference complements the enterprise basic research knowledge graph. At the same time, the paper constructs a probabilistic computational model of enterprise basic research with multi-attention mechanism, and computationally obtains the future hotspots of enterprise basic research. The experimental results show that compared with the existing classical models, the KG-CNN-BiLSTM evolutionary prediction model constructed in this paper has significant improvement in indicators such as AUC and F1 value, and excellent prediction accuracy. This study can more accurately capture several types of cutting-edge research topics within the field of basic research, and provides algorithmic guidance for related scholars to predict the development trend in the field of basic research.

Indexed as

Attention mechanismEnterprise basic researchEvolutionary prediction modelsKnowledge graph

Identifiers

PMID39956802
PMCPMC11830800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.