Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39956787›Full record

ReviewJournal of adolescence2025

From Burden to Enjoyment: A User-Centered Approach to Engage Adolescents in Intensive Longitudinal Research.

Anne Bülow, Loes H C Janssen, Evelien Dietvorst, Nadia A J D de Bij de Vaate, Manon H J Hillegers, Patti M Valkenburg, Loes Keijsers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of adolescence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In the moment, out of reach? Experience sampling with adolescents in the context of school smartphone bans and shifting societal norms.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anne BülowDepartment of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3335-7447
Loes H C JanssenAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3543-6026
Evelien DietvorstDepartment of Child and Adolescents Psychiatry/Psychology Erasmus MC Sophia, Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7353-9539
Nadia A J D de Bij de VaateAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9455-6944
Manon H J HillegersDepartment of Child and Adolescents Psychiatry/Psychology Erasmus MC Sophia, Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4877-282X
Patti M ValkenburgAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0477-8429
Loes KeijsersDepartment of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8580-6000

Funding

This research is supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research; Convergence, the alliance between Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam and Delft University of Technology; the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development 'Juiste Zorg Op De Juiste Plek' (ZonMw JZOJP); Stichting Vrienden van het Sophia; Gemeente Rotterdam; Dutch National Research Agenda (NWA); European Union (ERC).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdolescent psychology is embracing intensive longitudinal methods, such as diaries and experience sampling techniques, to investigate real-life experiences. However, participants might perceive the repetitive self-reporting in these data collection techniques as burdensome and demotivating, resulting in decreased compliance rates. In this tutorial paper, we present a user-centered approach aimed at making participation in experience sampling and daily diary studies a meaningful and fun experience for adolescents.

methodsIn three major research projects that took place between 2019 and 2023, more than 4,000 Dutch adolescents participated (12-25 years old). To improve the participants' user journey, adolescents were invited to codesign our studies and share their expertise in interviews (n = 459), focus groups (n = 101), design decisions (i.e., A/B tests, n = 107), pilots (n = 163), exit interviews (n = 167), and by answering user experience questionnaires (n = 2,109).

resultsAcross projects, we discovered five different main intrinsic and extrinsic motives to participate in intensive longitudinal studies: (1) rewards, (2) fun and interest, (3) helping science or the greater good, (4) helping the scientist or another person, and (5) gaining self-insight. We provide concrete examples of how we tailored our study designs to address these specific motives to optimize youth engagement.

conclusionsThe engagement of adolescents in intensive longitudinal studies can be enhanced by making it a meaningful and enjoyable experience, aligned with their own motives.

Indexed as

Psychology, AdolescentUser-Centered DesignAdolescentAdultChildFemaleFocus GroupsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMotivationNetherlandsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultcompliancedaily diary studiesengagementESMexperience samplingyouth participation

Identifiers

PMID39956787
PMCPMC12128904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.