ArticleBMJ open2025
Acceptance and commitment therapy for mild traumatic brain injury (ACTion-mTBI): a quasiexperimental feasibility study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Content and outcome of non-pharmacological rehabilitation for women with traumatic brain injury - a scoping review.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Concussion: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to determine the feasibility of recruiting, implementing and delivering an acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) (ACTion-mTBI) within a multidisciplinary outpatient mTBI rehabilitation services. The study also aimed to conduct a preliminary investigation of group differences between ACTion-mTBI and an equivalent cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) intervention on various outcome measures and psychological treatment targets.
designA two-arm quasiexperimental feasibility study.
settingFive mTBI rehabilitation clinics throughout New Zealand.
interventionPsychologists working in mTBI rehabilitation clinics throughout New Zealand were trained to deliver ACTion-mTBI or CBT. Eligible participants were assigned to either of these interventions based on the psychologist available at the clinic they were referred to. ACTion-mTBI is a five sessions intervention that incorporates all six components of the ACT model. The CBT intervention is an equivalent intervention and incorporating all four components of the CBT model. Both interventions are adapted for an mTBI context. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were related to the feasibility of ACTion-mTBI. This included recruitment, retention and treatment adherence of participants, study procedure and fidelity of treatment delivery. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: To explore group differences between ACTion-mTBI and CBT on functional disability, postconcussion symptoms, mental health, valued living and psychological flexibility.
resultsThe intervention proved feasible to implement with community-based mTBI rehabilitation services. Attrition rates were comparable between the two psychological interventions and fidelity to the treatments was high. At post-treatment, when covarying pretreatment scores, ACTion-mTBI had a significantly greater improvement in functional disability than CBT (moderate effect). ACTion-mTBI also had a significantly greater reduction in postconcussion symptoms, anxiety and stress. Promisingly, significant improvements in psychological flexibility was also found post-treatment. There were no group differences on depressive symptoms and valued living.
conclusionWe conclude that a full clinical trial of ACTion-mTBI for individuals with mTBI is feasible and warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN1262100059482.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.