Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39956596›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Vision Restoration through transorbital electrical stimulation in Optic Neuropathy in patients with significant optic atrophy due to primary open-angle glaucoma-a randomised, controlled, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial: the VIRON study protocol.

Michael Schittkowski, Johanna Pohlner, Karl Mercieca, Carsten Grohmann, Lena Kröger, Verena Prokosch, Kathrin Lorenz, Anna Beck, Jens Haueisen, Alexander Hunold and 11 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Michael Schittkowski *Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany michael.schittkowski@med.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6504-9532
Johanna Pohlner *Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Karl MerciecaOphthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Carsten GrohmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Lena KrögerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Verena ProkoschOphthalmology, University Hospital Cologne, Koeln, Germany.
Kathrin LorenzOphthalmology, Johannes Gutenberg University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Anna BeckOphthalmology, Johannes Gutenberg University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Jens HaueisenTechnische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany.
Alexander HunoldTechnische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany.
Maria BernhardTechnische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany.
Alexander RadbruchNeuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Peter DechentCognitive Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Marc BrockmannNeuroradiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Hans HoeraufDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Mathias BährNeurology, University of Goettingen Faculty of Medicine, Goettingen, Germany.
Bettina WabbelsOphthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7767-114X
Philip EndersOphthalmology, University Hospital Cologne, Koeln, Germany.
Thomas AsendorfDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Christian van Oterendorp *Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Andrea Antal *Neurology, University of Goettingen Faculty of Medicine, Goettingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlaucoma is one of the most common causes of blindness and affects more than 70 million people worldwide. The disease is characterised by the loss of retinal ganglion cells associated with a progressive optic neuropathy, resulting in an impairment of visual functions, for example, visual field loss. Nowadays, the only modifiable risk factor is the increase in intraocular pressure, and its treatment is to lower this pressure by medication, laser treatment or surgery to avoid disease progression. New methods for preventing and reversing vision loss are thus urgently needed. Several small and two multicentre studies have presented evidence that repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) can lead to long-lasting visual field improvement. This could open a new and inexpensive therapeutic option for optic atrophy. However, the level of evidence for this method is still fairly rather poor, and further trials are needed. Therefore, this clinical trial aims to prove the effectiveness of rtACS compared with sham stimulation in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: VIRON (Vision Restoration in Optic Neuropathy) is a national, multicentre, prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial with three arms. The primary objective is to assess the effectiveness of rtACS in patients with POAG compared with sham stimulation. The primary outcome is the change in mean defect (MD) in the visual field immediately after 10 sessions of rtACS (days 9, 16 and 23) compared with the values of initial perimetry (days -21 to -14 and 0) after applying electrical stimulation with a classical montage, compared with sham and electrical stimulation using individualised montage. Secondary outcome measures comprise a long-term effect with changes in MD at 24 weeks after stimulation, and data from the National Eye Institute Visual Function-25 and quality of life (Short Form 36) questionnaires. The target population are patients with glaucomatous optic atrophy and significant glaucomatous visual field defects (MD of 5-22 dB) due to POAG.After randomisation, patients received either classical rtACS (group 1), individual rtACS (group 2) or sham stimulation (group 3) in daily 25 min stimulation sessions in two series of five consecutive days separated by a weekend interval. In group 1, active stimulation will be via the routinely applied montage using two electrodes affixed on the right and left side of the head, next to the eyes, with straightforward fixation. In group 2, the current flow will be individually modelled (MRI-based) to target areas of partial visual field defects by optimising electrode positions in conjunction with an optimised visual fixation direction. Group 3 with sham stimulation will serve as control.The calculated sample size required to achieve a statistical power of 80% for a relevant effect size and allow for dropouts was 300 (100 per group). The trial has already begun with the first patient in July 2023. The planned recruitment period is 24 months with an estimated end of the study in November 2025 (last patient out). An adjusted extension of the study period is planned. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: VIRON was approved by the Central Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Göttingen (19 October 2022) and those of the individual participating centres (Bonn: 446/23-EP, Hamburg: 2023-200889-BO-bet, Cologne: 23-1487 and Mainz: 2023-17399-§23b). The study protocol complies with the Declaration of Helsinki, the national medicine device regulation (MDR) laws and the international standards of good clinical practice (GCP).The study protocol (V.5, 24 November 2023) was designed following the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials guidelines and is registered on https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00029129.As study initiatior the University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG) is responsible for data ownership and data management of the VIRON study. The study data will be published within 6 months of the study being completed. After the publication of the primary results, all data are anonymised and published in an open-access journal to ensure access to the data for third parties. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00029129.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyGlaucoma, Open-AngleOptic AtrophyDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeVisual AcuityVisual FieldsElectric Stimulation TherapyGlaucomaNEUROLOGYTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39956596
PMCPMC11831300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.