Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39956548›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2025

A behavioural science framework for tackling upstream challenges in health systems.

Jana Smith, Emily Zimmerman, Wambui Gachiengo Nyabero, Priya Nanda, Olufunke Fasawe, Sanam Roder-DeWan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jana Smithideas42, New York, New York, USA jana@ideas42.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6400-8050
Emily Zimmermanideas42, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Wambui Gachiengo NyaberoMedevice Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Priya NandaGlobal Health Consultant, Delhi, India.
Olufunke FasaweSexual Reproductive Maternal and Neonatal Health, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Abuja, Nigeria.
Sanam Roder-DeWanWorld Bank, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insights from behavioural science can inform a wide range of solutions including policy reforms, infrastructure changes, process reengineering, communications, devices and others. Its application in global health has, however, often focused on narrowly defined issues with linear theories of change that are relatively straightforward to study. Using behavioural science to examine 'upstream' actors in complex health systems holds promise as a complementary and underused approach to improving health systems. Behavioural scientists have missed opportunities to tackle systemic issues and the field of health systems strengthening rarely accounts for human behaviour at the macrolevel of health systems. We present a framework, developed by experts from a range of disciplinary backgrounds in global health and behavioural science that guides (1) the distillation of a health system challenge into concrete, addressable behaviours (specific actors and accompanying actions) and (2) the investigation of contextual factors that influence each behaviour.

Indexed as

Behavioral SciencesDelivery of Health CareGlobal HealthHumansDecision MakingGlobal HealthHealth systemsPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID39956548
PMCPMC11831263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.