ArticleEnvironmental research2025
Lead source apportionment and climatic impacts in rural environmental justice mining communities.
Article in Environmental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Compounding hazards posed by wildfires, flooding, and resource extraction: Assessing multimedia metal(loid) exposures and risk in rural, southwestern U.S. Populations.Environment international · 2026Article
- Toward Zero Waste Mining: Circular Economy of Copper Slags.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2025Review
- Plant and soil contaminant modeling paired with risk-based soil screening levels and ingestion rates for home gardening in environmental justice communities.Journal of environmental management · 2025Article
- Using the pollution load index to evaluate rooftop harvested rainwater metal(loid) contamination in environmental justice communities.Environmental research · 2025Article
- Pollution is ubiquitous: Community-based quantitative human health risk assessment of metal(loid) exposure from contaminated garden plants and soils.Ecotoxicology and environmental safety · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
After a sequence of natural disasters in Gila County, Arizona, USA environmental justice (EJ), mining areas, community members raised concerns about metal(loid)s exposure and origin. To address these concerns, non-residential sediments (0-2 cm, 2-15 cm, and 15-30 cm), household soil (0-2 cm), and indoor and outdoor dust samples were analyzed for metal(loid)s concentration and Pb isotopes via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. To identify the potential sources of Pb, 37 studies were considered, and 21 different Pb isotopic ratios were documented and compared. Spearman's correlation and principal component analysis were used to investigate the co-occurrence of metal(loid)s associated with Pb. The results demonstrated a clear association (p < 0.05) between Pb and mining activity in households and non-residential locations as well as a co-occurrence with As, Cd, Cu, Mo, Sb, and Zn at 0-2 cm and in non-residential with As, Cd, and Zn at 2-15 cm and 15-30 cm. The outdoor household dust was impacted by a mixture of Pb sources and was associated with metal(loid)s coming from mining, wildfire, lead based-paint and landfill, whereas indoor Pb dust was associated mainly with metal(loid)s coming from geogenic sources. Further, 66% of town/city sediment samples across depth and 53.8% of outdoor dust samples were aligned with mining fingerprint and 30.1% of outdoor dust and 25% of household soil samples were aligned with the wildfire Pb isotopic ratio/fingerprint. The Positive Matrix Factorization model illustrates flood's ability to remobilize metal(loid)s from neighboring mine sites to the households' locations. Currently there is no established Pb isotopic ratio composition for wildfires in Arizona; this study lays the foundation for understanding the complex relationship between the myriads of lead sources in our environment, wildfires, and flooding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.