ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2025
Adaptable graph neural networks design to support generalizability for clinical event prediction.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- iGraphCTC: an inter-connected graph convolutional network for comprehensive clinical trial collaborations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal graph neural networks in healthcare: a review of fusion strategies across biomedical domains.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWhile many machine learning and deep learning-based models for clinical event prediction leverage various data elements from electronic healthcare records such as patient demographics and billing codes, such models face severe challenges when tested outside of their institution of training. These challenges are rooted not only in differences in patient population characteristics, but medical practice patterns of different institutions.
methodWe propose a solution to this problem through systematically adaptable design of graph-based convolutional neural networks (GCNN) for clinical event prediction. Our solution relies on the unique property of GCNN where data encoded as graph edges is only implicitly used during the prediction process and can be adapted after model training without requiring model re-training.
resultsOur adaptable GCNN-based prediction models outperformed all comparative models during external validation for two different clinical problems, while supporting multimodal data integration. For prediction of hospital discharge and mortality, the comparative fusion baseline model achieved 0.58 [0.52-0.59] and 0.81[0.80-0.82] AUROC on the external dataset while the GCNN achieved 0.70 [0.68-0.70] and 0.91 [0.90-0.92] respectively. For prediction of future unplanned transfusion, we observed even more gaps in performance due to missing/incomplete data in the external dataset - late fusion achieved 0.44[0.31-0.56] while the GCNN model achieved 0.70 [0.62-0.84].
conclusionThese results support our hypothesis that carefully designed GCNN-based models can overcome generalization challenges faced by prediction models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.