Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39956347›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2025

Adaptable graph neural networks design to support generalizability for clinical event prediction.

Amara Tariq, Gurkiran Kaur, Leon Su, Judy Gichoya, Bhavik Patel, Imon Banerjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amara TariqArizona Advanced AI (A3I) Hub, Mayo Clinic Arizona, United States. Electronic address: tariq.amara@mayo.edu.
Gurkiran KaurDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, AZ, United States.
Leon SuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, AZ, United States.
Judy GichoyaDepartment of Radiology, Emory University, GA, United States.
Bhavik PatelDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, AZ, United States; School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, AZ, United States; Arizona Advanced AI (A3I) Hub, Mayo Clinic Arizona, United States.
Imon BanerjeeDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, AZ, United States; School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, AZ, United States; Arizona Advanced AI (A3I) Hub, Mayo Clinic Arizona, United States.

Funding

Opportunistic Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Estimation at Abdominal CTs with Robust and Unbiased Deep LearningR01HL167974 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Imon Banerjee, Akshay Chaudhari · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
Population-level Pulmonary Embolism Outcome Prediction with Imaging and Clinical Data: A Multi-Center StudyR01HL155410 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LANGLOTZ, CURTIS P, SHAH, NIGAM H · 2021 to 2024
$2.1M
Opportunistic Screening for ASCVD using a Multimodal Deep Learning Risk Prediction ModelR01HL167811 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Imon Banerjee, Judy Gichoya · 2024 to 2026
$2.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL155410NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL167811NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL167974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWhile many machine learning and deep learning-based models for clinical event prediction leverage various data elements from electronic healthcare records such as patient demographics and billing codes, such models face severe challenges when tested outside of their institution of training. These challenges are rooted not only in differences in patient population characteristics, but medical practice patterns of different institutions.

methodWe propose a solution to this problem through systematically adaptable design of graph-based convolutional neural networks (GCNN) for clinical event prediction. Our solution relies on the unique property of GCNN where data encoded as graph edges is only implicitly used during the prediction process and can be adapted after model training without requiring model re-training.

resultsOur adaptable GCNN-based prediction models outperformed all comparative models during external validation for two different clinical problems, while supporting multimodal data integration. For prediction of hospital discharge and mortality, the comparative fusion baseline model achieved 0.58 [0.52-0.59] and 0.81[0.80-0.82] AUROC on the external dataset while the GCNN achieved 0.70 [0.68-0.70] and 0.91 [0.90-0.92] respectively. For prediction of future unplanned transfusion, we observed even more gaps in performance due to missing/incomplete data in the external dataset - late fusion achieved 0.44[0.31-0.56] while the GCNN model achieved 0.70 [0.62-0.84].

conclusionThese results support our hypothesis that carefully designed GCNN-based models can overcome generalization challenges faced by prediction models.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsDeep LearningElectronic Health RecordsGraph Neural NetworksHumansMachine LearningPatient DischargeGeneralizable model designGraph convolutional neural networksMultimodal predictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID39956347
PMCPMC11917466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.