ReviewDigestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound: Measurements and Normal Findings - What Do You Need to Know?
Review in Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- An ingestible light source for deep photoacoustic imaging.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Lymph Node Assessment with Multiparametric Ultrasound: Normal Values, Morphologic Patterns, and Diagnostic Algorithms.Cancers · 2026Article
- Sonographic Anatomy and Normal Measurements of the Human Kidneys: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Small Intestine Tumors: Diagnostic Role of Multiparametric Ultrasound.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Ultrasound of the Gallbladder-An Update on Measurements, Reference Values, Variants and Frequent Pathologies: A Scoping Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Ultrasound of Bile Ducts-An Update on Measurements, Reference Values, and Their Influencing Factors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA standardized examination procedure and correct bowel wall assessment are the prerequisites for correct findings and for distinguishing normal findings from pathological diagnoses. PubMed was searched for the time period from January 01, 1990, to March 29, 2024, using a Boolean search. SUMMARY: The present work provides knowledge and details of the examination of the gastrointestinal tract in transcutaneous ultrasound with examination procedure, transducer selection, transducer guidance, knowledge of the identification of anatomical structures, and sonographic assessment. The sonographic reference values for the gastrointestinal tract were researched, compiled, and interpreted. In addition, citations and references of eligible studies were searched to identify further studies for inclusion. KEY MESSAGES: Knowledge of the sonographic appearance of the gastrointestinal tract and the standardized examination of the healthy gastrointestinal tract, including correct measurements, must be trained. Although age, body weight, and food ingestion influence the thickness of the intestinal wall, it does not normally exceed 2 mm in the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon on US. However, in most clinical studies 3 mm was used as cutoff for pathology. When assessing the appendix, an outer diameter of < 6 mm is considered normal. However, an increase in this diameter may also occur in healthy, asymptomatic people and should be not used as the sole criterion for diagnosing appendicitis. GIUS is now established as valid clinical method to assess patients with digestive diseases. Accordingly, there is a great need for training opportunities and supervision of young doctors who want to enhance their knowledge and skills in GIUS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.