ArticleJournal of interprofessional care
The team resilience prescription: Navigating adaptive and maladaptive processes in healthcare teams.
Article in Journal of interprofessional care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using the Stressor-System-Resilience Resources-Outcomes (SSRO) scaffold to clarify the core components of resilience research in medicine.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Associations Among Emotional Intelligence, Job Stress, and Clinical Decision-Making in Prehospital Emergency Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Interplay Between Team Resilience and Team Stress in Low-Stability Clinical Nursing Teams: A Cross-Lagged Panel Network Analysis.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- The impact of team psychological safety, occupational coping efficacy, and job satisfaction on the job performance of operating room nurses: an empirical study based on structural equation modeling.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the world turned its attention to healthcare professionals: everyone's lifeline. Yet, in doing so, patterns of overwork and exhaustion of those professionals were fortified, resulting in some of the highest burnout rates the field has ever seen. The picture becomes increasingly complex as most healthcare professionals work in teams, and resilient individuals do not necessarily make resilient teams. As many healthcare professionals are taught to keep going - no matter what the obstacles are - resilience ensues, but at what cost? This discussion article argues that team resilience comes in two forms: adaptive and maladaptive. We discuss how teams' exchange patterns can result in negative cycles of performance, resulting in harm to the self, one's team, and others (such as patients). We follow this discussion up by putting forward three pillars of adaptive team resilience grounded in job burnout's facets, integrating literature on sense of calling, emotional contagion, and team adaptability. Moreover, we consider the pivotal role of the healthcare hierarchy in these processes, and how individuals of differential rank can approach these pillars. We end with a brief discussion on how to incorporate these pillars into organizational practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.