ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic all-inside anterior talofibular ligament trans- augmentation repair versus modified trans- augmentation repair for patients with chronic ankle instability.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel classification system for avulsion fractures of the distal fibula based on arthroscopy-assisted measurement and significance to surgery and rehabilitation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- [Research progress on augmentation repair of anterior talofibular ligament under arthroscopy].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic ankle instability (CAI) often requires surgical intervention, but the optimal suturing repair technique remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of modified trans augmentation (MTA) suturing repair and trans augmentation (TA) suturing repair to provide a feasible option for patients with CAI and their surgeons.
methodsThis single-center retrospective study included 73 patients with CAI who treated between February 2019 and January 2021. Patients were assigned to MTA or TA groups based on ligament condition. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale (VAS), anterior drawer test, patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications.
resultsPostoperative AOFAS scores were significantly higher in the MTA group (91.0 ± 7.1) compared to the TA group (83.3 ± 9.4, P < 0.001). Similarly, patient satisfaction was higher in the MTA group (8.6 ± 0.9 vs. 8.1 ± 1.0, P = 0.02), whereas VAS scores were lower (1.2 ± 0.4 vs. 1.4 ± 0.5, P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in anterior drawer test results between the groups (P = 0.32).
conclusionsMTA suturing repair demonstrates superior clinical outcomes compared to TA suturing repair, providing a feasible for patients with CAI. These findings highlight the potential of MTA repair to improve patient satisfaction and functional recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.