Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39955586›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2025

Feature graphs for interpretable unsupervised tree ensembles: centrality, interaction, and application in disease subtyping.

Christel Sirocchi, Martin Urschler, Bastian Pfeifer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christel SirocchiDepartment of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Urbino, Urbino, 61029, Italy.
Martin UrschlerInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, 8036, Austria.
Bastian PfeiferInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, 8036, Austria. bastian.pfeifer@medunigraz.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Explainable and interpretable machine learning has emerged as essential in leveraging artificial intelligence within high-stakes domains such as healthcare to ensure transparency and trustworthiness. Feature importance analysis plays a crucial role in improving model interpretability by pinpointing the most relevant input features, particularly in disease subtyping applications, aimed at stratifying patients based on a small set of signature genes and biomarkers. While clustering methods, including unsupervised random forests, have demonstrated good performance, approaches for evaluating feature contributions in an unsupervised regime are notably scarce. To address this gap, we introduce a novel methodology to enhance the interpretability of unsupervised random forests by elucidating feature contributions through the construction of feature graphs, both over the entire dataset and individual clusters, that leverage parent-child node splits within the trees. Feature selection strategies to derive effective feature combinations from these graphs are presented and extensively evaluated on synthetic and benchmark datasets against state-of-the-art methods, standing out for performance, computational efficiency, reliability, versatility and ability to provide cluster-specific insights. In a disease subtyping application, clustering kidney cancer gene expression data over a feature subset selected with our approach reveals three patient groups with different survival outcomes. Cluster-specific analysis identifies distinctive feature contributions and interactions, essential for devising targeted interventions, conducting personalised risk assessments, and enhancing our understanding of the underlying molecular complexities.

Indexed as

Disease subtypingFeature graphsFeature selectionInterpretable machine learningUnsupervised random forest

Identifiers

PMID39955586
PMCPMC11829558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.