ArticleBMC oral health2025
Development of a diagnostic classification model for lateral cephalograms based on multitask learning.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to develop a cephalometric classification method based on multitask learning for eight diagnostic classifications.
methodsThis study was retrospective. A total of 3,310 lateral cephalograms were collected to construct a dataset. Eight clinical classifications were employed, including sagittal and vertical skeletal facial patterns, maxillary and mandibular anteroposterior positions, inclinations of upper and lower incisors, as well as their anteroposterior positions. The images were manually annotated for initially classification, which was verified by senior orthodontists. The data were randomly divided into training, validation, and test sets at a ratio of approximately 8:1:1. The multitask learning classification model was constructed based on the ResNeXt50_32 × 4d network and consisted of shared layers and task-specific layers. The performance of the model was evaluated using classification accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC).
resultsThis model could perform eight clinical diagnostic classifications on cephalograms within an average of 0.0096 s. The accuracy of the six classifications was 0.8-0.9, and the accuracy of the two classifications was 0.75-0.8. The overall AUC values for each classification exceeded 0.9.
conclusionsAn automatic diagnostic classification model for lateral cephalograms was established based on multitask learning to achieve simultaneous classification of eight common clinical diagnostic items. The multitask learning model achieved better classification performance and reduced the computational costs, providing a novel perspective and reference for addressing such problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.