ReviewJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Congenital unilateral pericardial agenesis presenting as an isolated chest pain in an adolescent: a case report and comprehensive review.
Review in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Congenital Pericardial Agenesis: An Innocent Finding or Clinically Significant Condition? A Case Series and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Partial Agenesis of the Pericardium: A Rare Cause of Palpitations in a Young Adult.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCongenital pericardial agenesis is a rare congenital anomaly resulting from the incomplete development of the pleuropericardial membranes during embryogenesis, leading to the partial or complete absence of the pericardial sac. Although this condition usually remains asymptomatic, it can present with various misleading symptoms such as chest pain (add some other, maybe 2, more prevalent presenting symptoms), making diagnosis challenging. Advanced imaging techniques are crucial for accurate diagnosis and management, especially when usual diagnostic modalities do not achieve a definite diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: The history and diagnostic process of a 16-year-old female who presented with isolated, non-exertional chest pain are detailed. A comprehensive diagnostic work-up was initiated, including chest X-ray (CXR), transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), CT angiography (CTA), and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI). These advanced imaging modalities unveiled the rare and elusive diagnosis of left-sided pericardial agenesis, decisively ruling out other potential causes and shedding light on an extraordinary case that challenges conventional diagnostic pathways.
conclusionUnilateral pericardial agenesis, though typically benign and often shrouded in clinical obscurity, can manifest with enigmatic symptoms such as isolated chest pain, necessitating a meticulous and comprehensive diagnostic approach. Multimodal imaging is essential for accurate diagnosis and for ruling out complications such as cardiac herniation or coronary artery compression. Considering the absence of significant complications, conservative management was chosen in this case, with the patient being discharged with instructions to monitor for any warning signs. CLINICAL KEY MESSAGE: Clinicians should consider congenital pericardial agenesis as one of the potential causes of unexplained chest pain, particularly when the initial investigations are inconclusive. Advanced imaging techniques (such as CXR and MRI) are vital for confirming the diagnosis and subsequently appropriate and timely management and preventing potential complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.