ArticleBMC research notes2025
Refined variant calling pipeline on RNA-seq data of breast cancer cell lines without matched-normal samples.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuronal differentiation of neuroblastoma cell lines for neurological disease modeling.iScience · 2026Article
- Human Placental Genomic Instability Predicts Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.Research square · 2025Article
- Refined variant calling pipeline on RNA-seq data of breast cancer cell lines without matched-normal samples.BMC research notes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRNA-seq delivers valuable insights both to transcriptional patterns and mutational landscapes for transcribed genes. However, as tumour cell lines frequently lack their matched-normal counterpart, variant calling without the paired normal sample is still challenging. In order to exclude variants of common genetic variation without a matched-normal control, filtering strategies need to be developed to identify tumour relevant variants in cell lines.
resultsHere, variants of 29 breast cancer cell lines were called on RNA-seq data via HaplotypeCaller. Low read depth sites, RNA-edit sites, and low complexity regions in coding regions were excluded. Common variants were filtered using 1000 genomes, gnomAD, and dbSNP data. Starting from hundred thousands of single nucleotide variants and small insertions and deletions, about thousand variants remained after filtering for each sample. Extracted variants were validated against the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) for 10 cell lines included in both data sets. Approximately half of the COSMIC variants were successfully called. Importantly, missing variants could mainly be attributed to sites with low read depth. Moreover, filtered variants also included all 10 cancer gene census COSMIC variants, a condensed hallmark variant set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.