Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39955557›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2025

Contrasting recovery of metagenome‑assembled genomes and derived bacterial communities and functional profiles from lizard fecal and cloacal samples.

Mauricio Hernández, Jorge Langa, Ostaizka Aizpurua, Yendi E Navarro-Noya, Antton Alberdi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mauricio HernándezDepartamento de Biología Celular y Genética, Escuela de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Tegucigalpa, 11101, Honduras. delmer.hernandez@unah.edu.hn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0205-3344
Jorge LangaDepartment of Genetics, Animal Physiology and Physical Anthropology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Barrio Sarriena S/N, 48940, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5137-8204
Ostaizka AizpuruaCenter for Evolutionary Hologenomics, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, 1353, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8053-3672
Yendi E Navarro-NoyaLaboratorio de Interacciones Bióticas, Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, Carretera San Martín Texmelucan Km 10.5, San Felipe Ixtacuixtla, 90120, Tlaxcala, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7191-7815
Antton AlberdiCenter for Evolutionary Hologenomics, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, 1353, Copenhagen, Denmark. antton.alberdi@sund.ku.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2875-6446

Funding

Danmarks Grundforskningsfond DNRF143Hezkuntza, Hizkuntza Politika Eta Kultura Saila, Eusko Jaurlaritza POS_2022_1_0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-resolved metagenomics, based on shotgun sequencing, has become a powerful strategy for investigating animal-associated bacterial communities, due its heightened capability for delivering detailed taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional insights compared to amplicon sequencing-based approaches. While genome-resolved metagenomics holds promise across various non-lethal sample types, their effectiveness in yielding high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes remains largely unexplored. Our investigation of fecal and cloacal microbiota of the mesquite lizards (Sceloporus grammicus) using genome-resolved metagenomics revealed that fecal samples contributed 97% of the 127 reconstructed bacterial genomes, whereas only 3% were recovered from cloacal swabs, which were largely enriched with host DNA. Taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional alpha bacterial diversity was greater in fecal samples than in cloacal swabs. We also observed significant differences in bacterial community composition between sampling methods, and higher inter-individual variation in cloacal swabs. Bacteroides, Phocaeicola and Parabacteroides (all Bacteroidota) were more abundant in the feces, whereas Hafnia and Salmonella (both Pseudomonadota) increased in the cloaca. Functional analyses showed that metabolic capacities of the microbiota to degrade polysaccharides, sugars and nitrogen compounds were enriched in fecal samples, likely reflecting the role of intestinal bacteria in nutrient metabolism. Overall, our results indicate that fecal samples outperform cloacal swabs in characterizing bacterial assemblages within lizards using genome-resolved metagenomics.

Indexed as

Genome-resolved metagenomicsMAGMicrobiomeNon-invasive methodsSceloporusShotgun sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39955557
PMCPMC11829382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.