ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2025
Use of individual Google Location History data to identify consumer encounters with food outlets.
Article in International journal of health geographics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAddressing key behavioral risk factors for chronic diseases, such as diet, requires innovative methods to objectively measure dietary patterns and their upstream determinants, notably the food environment. Although GIS techniques have pushed the boundaries by mapping food outlet availability, they often simplify food access dynamics to the vicinity of home addresses, possibly misclassifying neighborhood effects. Leveraging Google Location History Timeline (GLH) data offers a novel approach to assess long-term patterns of food outlet utilization at an individual level, providing insights into the relationship between food environment interactions, diet quality, and health outcomes.
methodsWe leveraged GLH data previously collected from a sub-set of participants in the Washington State Twin Registry (WSTR). GLH included more than 287 million location records from 357 participants. We developed methods to identify visits to food outlets using outlet-specific buffer zones applied to the InfoUSA data on food outlet locations. This methodology involved the application of minimum and maximum stay durations, along with revisit intervals. We calculated metrics from the GLH data to detect frequency of visits to different food outlet classifications (e.g. grocery stores, fast food, convenience stores) important to health. Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of our food outlet metrics and to examine visits occurring within 1 and 2.5 km of residential locations.
resultsWe identified 156,405 specific food outlet visits for the 357 study participants. 60% were full-service restaurants, 15% limited-service restaurants, and 16% supermarkets. Mean visits per person per month to any food outlet was 12.795. Only 8, 10 and 11% of full-service restaurants, limited-service restaurants, and supermarkets, respectively, occurred within 1 km of residential locations.
conclusionsGLH data presents a novel method to assess individual-level food utilization behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.