SynthesisBMC health services research2025
Mobile applications enhance out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patients' experiences of mobile health tools for chronic heart failure self-management: a qualitative meta-synthesis.BMJ open · 2026Pooled it
- Association of a smartphone-based CPR assistance system with prehospital outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a pre-post observational study in Bangkok.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Motivational aspects among MEDical Students to Participate as first ResPONDer in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (MEDSPOND): a pre-post educational intervention study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators while implementing community first responder systems in a western setting: mixed-methods expert consensus.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Maccabi-RED, mHealth innovation in community emergency care: a 4-year analysis of adoption patterns and impact on healthcare utilization.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMobile applications, as innovative tools for promoting bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), have demonstrated potential to improve outcomes for patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This meta-analysis sought to systematically review the technical features of existing mobile applications and evaluate their impact on OHCA patient outcomes under various emergency response strategies. The findings aimed to guide the development and optimization of prehospital public emergency response systems.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, from inception to August 2023. The included studies involved notifying citizens via text messages or smartphone applications to act as first responders or volunteers in OHCA cases. Using a random effects model and subgroup analysis, we synthesized the results to identify sources of heterogeneity and assess outcomes.
resultsThirteen mobile applications were included, with an average activation rate of 35.3% among patients and a volunteer arrival rate of 53.3%. Compared to traditional emergency medical services, mobile applications significantly improved survival to discharge or 30-day survival rates (RR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.24-1.44; P < 0.05), return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rates upon hospital admission (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.09-1.40; P < 0.05), bystander CPR rates (RR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.13-1.37; P < 0.05), and bystander defibrillation rates (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.00-1.51; P = 0.05). Subgroup analyses revealed consistent results for bystander CPR rates and survival outcomes, while variations in defibrillation rates and ROSC at admission were observed, indicating potential influences of application design and operational parameters.
conclusionsThis study highlighted the significant potential of mobile applications in enhancing bystander interventions and improving patient outcomes. Addressing challenges such as improving access to automated external defibrillators and raising public awareness remained essential to maximizing their overall effectiveness. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023477676.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.