ReviewBMC urology2025
High-grade eosinophilic renal tumor/eosinophilic vacuolar renal tumor: a case report and literature review.
Review in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- CT/MRI imaging and immunohistochemical analyses of eosinophilic vacuolar tumor of the kidney: case reports of four patients.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Eosinophilic vacuolated tumor of the kidney misdiagnosed as upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionRenal oncocytoma (RO) is an uncommon benign neoplasm of the kidney, while eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) represents a distinct subtype of renal oncocytoma characterized by specific morphological features. EVT is a rare eosinophilic renal neoplasm distinguished by its unique morphological, immunophenotypic, and molecular genetic attributes. Its biological behavior is generally indolent, and it is associated with a favorable prognosis. CASE REPORT: This case report provides a comprehensive account of a 52-year-old female patient who presented to the hospital for a medical evaluation, revealing that her left kidney had been occupying space for over one month. Following an abdominal enhanced CT scan, a diagnosis of renal clear cell carcinoma was suspected, leading to the decision to perform a "robot-assisted laparoscopic partial left nephrectomy." During the surgical procedure, a mass measuring approximately 3.8 × 3.5 cm was identified adjacent to the renal hilum in the midsection of the left kidney. Subsequent pathological analysis classified the excised tumor as an eosinophilic vacuolar tumor of the kidney.
conclusionThis case illustrates that EVT represents a novel solid neoplasm of the kidney, with occurrences being exceedingly uncommon. It is imperative for clinicians and pathologists to enhance their comprehension of these tumors and distinguish them effectively, thereby facilitating more precise classification of renal tumors and informing clinical management and prognostic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.