Trial reportJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026
Enhancing survivorship care among Hispanic/Latino cancer survivors via lay health educators: results of a pilot randomized trial.
Trial report in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04081779 (IMPACT), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
IMPACT: Improving Access to Cancer Survivorship Via Telehealth
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAssess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of lay health educators to enhance Hispanic/Latino survivors' knowledge of their cancer history, screening needs, and health-related self-efficacy.
methodsHispanic/Latino survivors diagnosed within 5 years were recruited from three clinics and a regional cancer registry. Survivors were randomized to receive a personalized survivorship care plan (SCP; control) or SCP plus telephone session with a bilingual-bicultural lay health educator (intervention). Survivors were reassessed after 3 months. Primary outcomes were feasibility (meeting accrual, n = 60-100) and acceptability of the SCP and education session. Secondary outcomes were changes in survivors' knowledge of their cancer history, screening needs, and health-related self-efficacy.
resultsNinety-fine survivors (median age 55 years, 78% female, 56% low/marginal health literacy) were randomized (n = 48 intervention). Seventy-nine completed the study; most found the SCP useful (82% intervention; 68% control); 84% of the intervention group rated the education session useful. Over time, both groups had improved knowledge of their cancer history (accuracy increased from 71.5 ± 16.4% to 73.8 ± 15.0%; p = 0.19) although differences over time and between groups were not statistically significant. At follow-up compared with baseline, participants were more likely to report plans for future screening: cervical (57% versus 31%, p = 0.002); colorectal (39% versus 26%, p = 0.10). Although the change in self-efficacy did not differ between study groups, self-efficacy significantly improved within the control group over time (0.3; 95% CI 0.1, 0.5).
conclusionsHispanic/Latino survivors found the SCP and education session acceptable. SCPs alone may improve knowledge and adherence to cancer screening. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Provision of a SCP may benefit Hispanic/Latino survivors. CLINICAL
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov NCT04081779.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.