Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39955419›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Reassessing estrogen receptor expression thresholds for breast cancer prognosis in HER2-negative patients using shape restricted modeling.

Wenli Dong, Takeo Fujii, Jing Ning, Toshiaki Iwase, Jing Qin, Naoto T Ueno, Yu Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenli Dong *Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Takeo Fujii *Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Jing NingDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Toshiaki IwaseDepartments of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jing QinBiostatistics Research Branch, National Institution of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Naoto T UenoDepartments of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. nueno@cc.hawaii.edu.
Yu ShenDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. yshen@mdanderson.org.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Elucidating the role of thrombosis and inflammation in breast cancer metastasisZIABC012130 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI FUJII, TAKEO · 2023 to 2025
$2.2M
Statistical Methods for Integration of Multiple Data Sources toward Precision Cancer MedicineR01CA269696 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI JING NING, YU SHEN · 2022 to 2026
$1.7M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC012130National Institutes of Health (NIH) ZIA BC 012130NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA269696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used a novel shape-restricted Cox model to determine the desirable ER expression cutoff to predict breast cancer prognoses. Our model treats ER as a continuous variable using a flexible monotone-shaped Cox regression to assess its association with survival outcomes holistically. The study included 3055 patients with stage II/III HER2-negative breast cancer. The primary outcomes were time to recurrence or death (TTR) and overall survival (OS). The shape-restricted Cox model identified 10% ER as the preferred cutoff to predict TTR. The finding was confirmed by the log-rank test and standard Cox model that patients with ER ≥ 10% had TTR benefit over ER < 10% (log-rank p < 0.001). No OS or TTR benefit of adjuvant endocrine therapy was observed in patients with 1% ≤ ER < 10% (HR 0.877, 95% CI 0.481-1.600, p = 0.668 for TTR and HR 0.698, 95% CI 0.337-1.446, p = 0.333 for OS). Using the shape-restricted Cox model, this study suggests a potential preferred threshold of 10% for predicting TTR. The findings could assist physicians in effectively weighing the benefits and risks of adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with ER < 10% disease, particularly in cases involving severe adverse events.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenEndocrine therapyEstrogen receptorModellingSurvivalThreshold

Identifiers

PMID39955419
PMCPMC11829975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.