Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39955402›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Advanced AI-driven techniques for fault and transient analysis in high-voltage power systems.

Abdul Aziz, Muhammad Zain Yousaf, Feng Renhai, Wajid Khan, Umar Siddique, Mehran Ahmad, Muhammad Abbas, Mohit Bajaj, Ievgen Zaitsev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abdul Aziz *CECOS University of IT and Emerging Sciences Peshawar Kpk Pakistan, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Muhammad Zain Yousaf *Center for Renewable Energy and Microgrids, Huanjiang Laboratory, Zhejiang University, Zhuji, 311816, Zhejiang, China.
Feng RenhaiSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. fengrenhai@tju.edu.cn.
Wajid KhanSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Umar SiddiqueComputer Systems Engineering, UET Peshawar, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan.
Mehran AhmadComputer Systems Engineering, UET Peshawar, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan.
Muhammad AbbasSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Mohit BajajDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, 248002, India.
Ievgen ZaitsevDepartment of Theoretical Electrical Engineering and Diagnostics of Electrical Equipment, Institute of Electrodynamics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Beresteyskiy, 56, Kyiv-57, Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine. zaitsev@i.ua.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each substation is critically essential to the overall operation of the electrical power system. Potential dangers include thermal stress, noise, slip, trip, fall hazards, animal waste, and nonionizing radiation. These are the causes of joint failures of cables and overhead lines, failure of one or more phases of circuit breakers, and melting of fuses or conductors in one or more phases. These kinds of failures bring about a decline in the substation's level of dependability. On the consumer side, power cannot be received adequately because there are losses in the transmission line. To accomplish the objective of enhancing the voltage profile, the DG must be optimized. The substation's transient analysis utilizing a variety of factors, a study of faults and transients that occur in the substation and their effects using ETAP, and an optimization of a range of parameters using artificial intelligence techniques are all used for this goal. This paper offers the complete simulation of a 500kv substation. The simulation uses advanced software Electrical Transient Analyzer Program (ETAP) with detailed load flow analysis and short circuit study of the 500 kV substation system using ETAP software. From the ETAP-generated load flow details and the short circuit details, which are studied by varying loads or other parameters, these whole simulations are carried out multiple times using real-time data from the past eighteen months. A simulation data set contains data on both standard and different faulty conditions. In the 1st step, the normal and faulty conditions are classified. In the 2nd step, the reasons for fault occurrence include line-to-line, line-to-ground, and double line-to-ground using the Artificial Intelligence technique. In both steps, Catboost performs well, followed by Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression. In the first step, Catboost classifies normal and faulty conditions with an accuracy of 98%, SVM is 96%, and Logistic regression is 93%. Again, in the 2nd step to identify different faulty conditions, the accuracies of Catboost SVM and Logistic Regression are 97%, 95%, and 92%, respectively.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCatboostLoad flowRadial distribution systemShort circuit analysis

Identifiers

PMID39955402
PMCPMC11830076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.