Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39955398›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

Self-supervised identification and elimination of harmful datasets in distributed machine learning for medical image analysis.

Raissa Souza, Emma A M Stanley, Anthony J Winder, Chris Kang, Kimberly Amador, Erik Y Ohara, Gabrielle Dagasso, Richard Camicioli, Oury Monchi, Zahinoor Ismail and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Raissa SouzaDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. raissa.souzadeandrad@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7455-3383
Emma A M StanleyDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7802-6820
Anthony J WinderDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9650-5526
Chris KangDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Kimberly AmadorDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3956-1895
Erik Y OharaDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Gabrielle DagassoDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Richard CamicioliNeuroscience and Mental Health Institute and Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Oury MonchiDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Zahinoor IsmailHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5529-3731
Matthias WilmsHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8845-360X
Nils D ForkertDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2556-3224

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distributed learning enables collaborative machine learning model training without requiring cross-institutional data sharing, thereby addressing privacy concerns. However, local quality control variability can negatively impact model performance while systematic human visual inspection is time-consuming and may violate the goal of keeping data inaccessible outside acquisition centers. This work proposes a novel self-supervised method to identify and eliminate harmful data during distributed learning model training fully-automatically. Harmful data is defined as samples that, when included in training, increase misdiagnosis rates. The method was tested using neuroimaging data from 83 centers for Parkinson's disease classification with simulated inclusion of a few harmful data samples. The proposed method reliably identified harmful images, with centers providing only harmful datasets being easier to identify than single harmful images within otherwise good datasets. While only evaluated using neuroimaging data, the presented method is application-agnostic and presents a step towards automated quality control in distributed learning.

Identifiers

PMID39955398
PMCPMC11830037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.