ArticleScientific reports2025
CT based 3D radiomic and clinical airway examination model for evaluating mask ventilation in oral and maxillofacial surgery patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to develop a model that incorporates clinical measurements with 3D radiomic signatures extracted from CT images of oral and maxillofacial surgery patients to evaluate mask ventilation. A prospective cohort trial was conducted to enroll patients scheduled for oral and maxillofacial surgery. After obtaining informed consent, clinical measurements and head and neck CT images were collected. The anesthesiologist who managed the airway graded the mask ventilation. Difficult mask ventilation was defined as mask ventilation that required assistance or the use of an oral airway or other adjuvant by the anesthesiologist. For radiomics analysis, 3D airway segmentation was extracted and calculated 3D radiomic signatures and corresponding radiological features. Subsequently, features in the clinical measurements model and radiomic signatures model were determined using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) classifier. A mixed model was developed that incorporated both radiomic signature features and clinical measurement features. A total of 716 patients were enrolled in the study. The mixed model combined the five 3D radiomic signatures and six clinical measurements, and was found to have the highest predictive accuracy. In the validation group, the mixed group had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.851, which was higher than the AUC of 0.812 in the clinical measurements model and 0.827 in the radiomic signatures model. This study developed a mixed model that combines 3D radiomic signatures and clinical measurements. Its application in clinical practice can assist in identifying patients at risk of experiencing difficult mask ventilation during oral and maxillofacial surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.