Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39955372›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

CT based 3D radiomic and clinical airway examination model for evaluating mask ventilation in oral and maxillofacial surgery patients.

He Ren, Lingling Qu, Weiwei Shi, Wenlong Zhao, Linhui Li, Chenyu Wu, Ping Li, Jiayi Wang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

He Ren *Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Lingling Qu *Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Weiwei Shi *Shanghai YangZhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Wenlong Zhao *Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Linhui LiDepartment of Otolaryngology Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Chenyu WuShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Ping LiShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China. lip@sumhs.edu.cn.
Jiayi WangAnesthesiology Department of Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200011, China. iriswjy1991@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study is to develop a model that incorporates clinical measurements with 3D radiomic signatures extracted from CT images of oral and maxillofacial surgery patients to evaluate mask ventilation. A prospective cohort trial was conducted to enroll patients scheduled for oral and maxillofacial surgery. After obtaining informed consent, clinical measurements and head and neck CT images were collected. The anesthesiologist who managed the airway graded the mask ventilation. Difficult mask ventilation was defined as mask ventilation that required assistance or the use of an oral airway or other adjuvant by the anesthesiologist. For radiomics analysis, 3D airway segmentation was extracted and calculated 3D radiomic signatures and corresponding radiological features. Subsequently, features in the clinical measurements model and radiomic signatures model were determined using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) classifier. A mixed model was developed that incorporated both radiomic signature features and clinical measurement features. A total of 716 patients were enrolled in the study. The mixed model combined the five 3D radiomic signatures and six clinical measurements, and was found to have the highest predictive accuracy. In the validation group, the mixed group had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.851, which was higher than the AUC of 0.812 in the clinical measurements model and 0.827 in the radiomic signatures model. This study developed a mixed model that combines 3D radiomic signatures and clinical measurements. Its application in clinical practice can assist in identifying patients at risk of experiencing difficult mask ventilation during oral and maxillofacial surgeries.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalOral Surgical ProceduresRespiration, ArtificialSurgery, OralTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMasksMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiomics3D radiomicsAirway evaluationMask ventilation, computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID39955372
PMCPMC11830077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.