ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing nutritional strategies in term NEC and perforation infants after intestinal operation: a retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Optimal enteral feeding after surgery for necrotising enterocolitis: a systematic review.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Pooled it
- Surgical Necrotising Enterocolitis (S-NEC): Where We Stand Today: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) represents a severe condition in infants, with perforation being a particularly critical pathological manifestation. However, there is an absence of guidelines regarding the refeeding of infants recovering from perforation subsequent to NEC. This study aimed to determine the optimal refeeding method for term infants recovering from perforation after NEC. The study encompassed three aspects: the timing of enteral nutrition (EN) resumption, the progression of EN, and the method of EN resumption. Ninety full-term neonates who developed perforation following NEC and underwent surgical intervention were included. These samples were divided into early enteral nutrition (EEN, < 7 days) and late enteral nutrition (LEN, ≥ 7 days) groups based on the timing of EN resumption; faster increase (FI, ≥ 20 ml/kg/d) and slower increase (SI, < 20 ml/kg/d) groups based on the progression of EN; intact protein formula (IPF), special medical formula (SMF, including EHF and AABF), and mixed feeding (MF) groups based on the method of EN resumption. EEN infants had a lower incidence of intestinal stenosis and reoperation (43.5% vs. 77.6%, p = 0.002; 60.9% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.038), and a shorter duration of hospital stay after surgery and parenteral nutrition (PN) than LEN infants (14 days vs. 20 days, p < 0.001; 11 days vs. 17 days, p < 0.001). Faster increasing feed volumes was associated with shorter duration of hospital stay and parenteral nutrition (15 days vs. 20 days, p < 0.001; 14 days vs. 17 days, p < 0.001), but a slower rate of weight gain (0.020 kg vs. 0.129 kg, p < 0.01). The time to repeat NPO in SMF group is shorter than IPF an MF groups (3 days vs. 4 days and 9 days, p = 0.025). Our study demonstrates the beneficial effects of early enteral feeding and fast advancement of feed volumes in term infants with NEC and perforation after surgery, specifically in reducing short-term complications and the duration of hospital stay following surgery and PN. Additionally, this study suggests that IPF and MF significantly contribute to stimulate intestinal adoption recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.