SynthesisWorld journal of urology2025
Crossed paths: a systematic review unveiling patterns in crossed testicular ectopia.
Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Familial crossed testicular ectopia: Insights from three sibling cases.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Fused variant of crossed testicular ectopia: A case report and discussion of the literature.Urology case reports · 2025Article
- Transverse Testicular Ectopia Associated With Müllerian Remnants: Importance of Preoperative Imaging.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCrossed Testicular Ectopia (CTE) is a rare congenital anomaly where both testes descend on one side of the body. Although previously believed to be exceedingly uncommon, the number of published cases has grown, suggesting it may be more prevalent than initially believed. CTE is associated with various abnormalities, of which the most cited anomaly is persistent mullerian duct syndrome (PMDS) which has its own implications regarding infertility. This systematic review aims to clarify the impact of CTE on fertility, histopathology, associated congenital abnormalities, and potential long-term outcomes.
methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed to identify relevant studies on CTE. Inclusion criteria covered case reports, case series, and meta-analyses with individual case data published in English. Two reviewers independently extracted data, including demographic details, diagnostic methods, histological findings, and fertility status. Data analysis was performed using JMP software.
resultsWe identified 417 cases of CTE, a significant increase from previous review. CTE was diagnosed preoperatively in only 42.6% of cases, with ultrasound and MRI achieving the highest diagnostic success rates. Histological abnormalities were common, observed in 66% of cases, including testicular dysgenesis, Leydig cell hyperplasia, and malignancy. Infertility was reported in 79.2% of patients, notably high even among those with unilateral undescended testes. Fusion anomalies involving the spermatic cord, vas deferens, or testes were documented in 9.5% of cases. PMDS was the most common associated anomaly, identified in 33.3% of cases, and appeared to reduce the likelihood of fusion anomalies.
conclusionThis review highlights CTE as a complex and potentially underdiagnosed condition with significant implications for fertility and cancer risk. Early diagnosis and intervention are essential to improving long-term outcomes, while future research should investigate the genetic factors underlying CTE and optimize diagnostic protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39955345What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.