Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39955327›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Unified total body CT image with multiple organ specific windowings: validating improved diagnostic accuracy and speed in trauma cases.

Naoki Okada, Shusuke Inoue, Chang Liu, Sho Mitarai, Shinichi Nakagawa, Yohsuke Matsuzawa, Satoshi Fujimi, Goshiro Yamamoto, Tomohiro Kuroda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Naoki OkadaGraduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Yoshida-honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan. naoki_okada@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Shusuke Inouefcuro inc, Osaka-shi, Osaka, Japan.
Chang LiuGraduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Yoshida-honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Sho MitaraiGraduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Yoshida-honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Shinichi NakagawaUji Tokushukai Hospital, Uji-shi, Kyoto, Japan.
Yohsuke MatsuzawaOsaka Metropolitan University, Osaka-shi, Osaka, Japan.
Satoshi FujimiOsaka General Medical Center, Osaka-shi, Osaka, Japan.
Goshiro YamamotoGraduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Yoshida-honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Tomohiro KurodaGraduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Yoshida-honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.

Funding

Japanese Agency for Medical Research and Development 22he1022008h0001, 23he1022008h0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total-body CT scans are useful in saving trauma patients; however, interpreting numerous images with varied window settings slows injury detection. We developed an algorithm for "unified total-body CT image with multiple organ-specific windowings (Uni-CT)", and assessing its impact on physician accuracy and speed in trauma CT interpretation. From November 7, 2008, to June 19, 2020, 40 cases of total-body CT images for blunt trauma with multiple injuries, were collected from the emergency department of Osaka General Medical Center and randomly divided into two groups. In half of the cases, the Uni-CT algorithm using semantic segmentation assigned visibility-friendly window settings to each organ. Four physicians with varying levels of experience interpreted 20 cases using the algorithm and 20 cases in conventional settings. The performance was analyzed based on the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of the target findings, and diagnosis speed. In the proposal and conventional groups, patients had an average of 2.6 and 2.5 targeting findings, mean ages of 51.8 and 57.7 years, and male proportions of 60% and 45%, respectively. The agreement rate for physicians' diagnoses was κ = 0.70. Average accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of target findings were 84.8%, 74.3%, 96.9% and 85.5%, 81.2%, 91.5%, respectively, with no significant differences. Diagnostic speed per case averaged 71.9 and 110.4 s in each group (p < 0.05). The Uni-CT algorithm improved the diagnostic speed of total-body CT for trauma, maintaining accuracy comparable to that of conventional methods.

Indexed as

Multiple TraumaTomography, X-Ray ComputedWhole Body ImagingWounds and InjuriesWounds, NonpenetratingAdultAgedAlgorithmsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityAutomated windowingDeep learning modelDiagnostic imagingTrauma

Identifiers

PMID39955327
PMCPMC11830084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.