ArticleScientific reports2025
Association of cancers with the occurrence and 28-day mortality of sepsis: a mendelian randomization and mediator analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Significance of the Prothrombin Time-International Normalized Ratio to Albumin Ratio in Cancer Patients with Complication of Sepsis: A Retrospectively Cohort Study.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Article
- A cross-ancestry genetic atlas of shared susceptibility between infectious diseases and cancer.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of microbial diversity and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with and without malignancies: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Cause-specific mortality beyond prostate cancer in young men: a population-based study of second malignancies and non-tumor causes.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- The Overlapping Biology of Sepsis and Cancer and Therapeutic Implications.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Observational studies have indicated an association between cancer and the occurrence of sepsis, with an increased risk of mortality in cancer-related sepsis. However, whether a causal relationship exists between the two remains unknown. Summary statistics of thirteen cancers from the largest available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of GWAS catalog and FinnGen biobank were extracted for the MR analysis. GWAS data for sepsis and its 28-day mortality were obtained from MRC-IEU. Univariable, multivariable, and reverse MR analyses were employed to explore potential associations between cancers and sepsis and its 28-day mortality. Moreover, a two-step mediation MR analysis was performed to investigate independent positive causal relationships between cancers and sepsis and its 28-day mortality. In univariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, significant causal relationships were found between genetically predicted lung cancer (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.08-1.26, adjusted p = 0.001), squamous cell lung carcinoma (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.02-1.18, adjusted p = 0.042), lung adenocarcinoma (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.03-1.21, adjusted p = 0.032), small cell lung carcinoma (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02-1.12, adjusted p = 0.031), and sepsis. Subsequent multivariable MR analysis revealed that these three types of lung cancer were independently associated with the risk of sepsis. Additionally, a causal relationship was found between lung cancer and 28-day mortality from sepsis, while no causal link was observed between non-solid tumors and the onset or death of sepsis. Reverse MR analysis did not indicate a potential for sepsis to trigger the onset of cancers. Furthermore, TRAIL was found to have promotive effects on the occurrence and mortality of sepsis. Lung cancer causally correlates with increased sepsis occurrence and 28-day mortality, as evidenced by Mendelian Randomization analysis. Genetic predispositions enhance this risk, underscoring the potential of genetic profiling to guide early, precise sepsis interventions in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.