Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39955297›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning enhanced grey box soft sensor for melt viscosity prediction in polymer extrusion processes.

Yasith S Perera, Jie Li, Chamil Abeykoon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Suppressing mechanical property variability in recycled plastics via bioinspired design.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yasith S PereraNorthwest Composites Centre and Aerospace Research Institute, Department of Materials, Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Jie LiCentre for Process Integration, Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Chamil AbeykoonNorthwest Composites Centre and Aerospace Research Institute, Department of Materials, Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. chamil.abeykoon@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/T517823/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/V051008/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melt viscosity is regarded as a key quality indicator of the polymer melt in polymer extrusion processes. However, limitations such as disturbances to the melt flow and measurement delays of the existing in-line and side-stream rheometers prevent the monitoring and controlling of this key parameter in real time. Soft sensors can be employed to monitor physical parameters that are difficult to measure using hardware sensing instruments. This study presents a grey-box soft sensing solution to predict the melt viscosity in real time, which combines physics-based knowledge with machine learning. A fine-tuned physics-based mathematical model is used to make melt viscosity predictions, and a deep neural network is employed to compensate for its prediction errors. The proposed soft sensor model reported a normalised root mean square error of 2.2[Formula: see text]10

Identifiers

PMID39955297
PMCPMC11830027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.