Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39954740›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of nutrition2025

Beans Improve Satiety to an Effect that Is Not Significantly Different from Beef in Older Adults: A Randomized, Crossover Trial.

Megan J Fluit, Brooke F Adams, Zachary J Ribau, Alison M Duncan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05499819 (The Effect of Beans Compared to Beef on Satiety and Food Intake in Older Adults), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05499819 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Beans Compared to Beef on Satiety and Food Intake in Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of GuelphRan2022 to 2023Enrolled35ConditionsOlder AdultsArmsCanned black beans, drained and rinsed, Canned red kidney beans, drained and rinsed, Extra-lean ground beef
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Megan J FluitDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Brooke F AdamsDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Zachary J RibauDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Alison M DuncanDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: amduncan@uoguelph.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBeans are a candidate food for increasing satiety due to their protein and dietary fiber content. Beef is a common animal protein that can increase satiety due to its protein content, which is higher than beans but does not contain dietary fiber. Dietary guidance encourages higher intake of plant-based protein foods and warrants satiety studies that compare plant and animal protein foods, which could particularly benefit the rapidly growing population segment of older adults.

objectivesTo compare the effects of 2 bean varieties and beef consumed within a breakfast tortilla on satiety, food intake, and 24-h energy intake in older adults.

methodsOlder adults [n = 35, age 72.4 ± 6.66 y, BMI (in kg/m

resultsFullness and satisfaction were significantly increased, while hunger, desire to eat, and prospective food consumption were significantly decreased, following consumption of the black bean, red kidney bean, and beef test meals. Appetite sensation AUCs, ad libitum pizza intake, and 24-h energy intake did not significantly differ between the test meals.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that beans improve satiety to an extent that is not significantly different from beef in older adults, thereby supporting the role of beans as a nutrient-dense source of protein and dietary fiber as part of a satisfying meal for older adults. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05499819.

Indexed as

FabaceaeRed MeatSatiationAgedAnimalsAppetiteCattleCross-Over StudiesDietary FiberDietary ProteinsEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansMaleDietary FiberDietary Proteinsappetite sensationsbeansbeefolder adultssatiety

Identifiers

PMID39954740
PMCPMC12107252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.