ArticleExperimental and molecular pathology2025
Diagnostic next-generation sequencing to detect MYD88 L265P in Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma compared to ddPCR.
Article in Experimental and molecular pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Detection ofClinical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) is a B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder typically involving the bone marrow with infiltration by small lymphocytes and plasma cells. Studies have identified MYD88 L265P mutation as a diagnostic marker to distinguish LPL from other small B-cell lymphomas. Detection rates for this mutation have varied depending on the analytic methodology, with previous data suggesting that routine next-generation sequencing (NGS) does not demonstrate the required sensitivity to reliably detect MYD88 L265P. NGS has become part of routine clinical testing because it allows detection of variants across multiple genes. To study the utility of NGS in the detection of MYD88 L265P, we performed droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and routine NGS on a cohort of 34 cases of lymphoid neoplasms (22 LPL, 4 CLL, 1 MCL, 1 MGUS, 2 plasma cell myeloma, and 4 negative bone marrow cases). We utilized manual review and BAMtools to assess MYD88 L265P in NGS cases. Limit of detection for ddPCR was determined to be 0.4 % variant allele frequency (VAF) with 10 ng DNA input. MYD88 L265P VAF detection by NGS and ddPCR was comparable down to 0.5 % VAF (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.