Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39954282›Full record

ArticleMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2025

Intelligent biofilm detection with ensemble of deep learning networks.

B-P Sobrinho, B-P Silva, K-M Andrade, B-P Sobrinho, D-A Ribeiro, J-N Santos, L-R Oliveira, P-R Cury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

B-P SobrinhoFaculdade de Odontologia Avenida Araújo Pinho, 62, Canela 40110-150, Salvador/Bahia, Brazil patcury@yahoo.com; patricia.cury@ufba.br.
B-P Silva
K-M Andrade
B-P Sobrinho
D-A Ribeiro
J-N Santos
L-R Oliveira
P-R Cury

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDental biofilm is traditionally identified visually, which can be challenging and time-consuming due to its color similarity with the tooth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of U-Net neural networks for the automatic detection of dental biofilm without disclosing agents on intraoral photographs of deciduous and permanent teeth using an ensemble strategy. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis retrospective exploratory study was conducted on two datasets of intraoral images obtained from deciduous and permanent dentitions. The first dataset was used to validate dental biofilm annotations by an expert with disclosing agents. The second dataset, without disclosing agents, was employed to train and evaluate the U-Net neural network in the identification of dental biofilms using an ensemble strategy.

resultsThe performance of the ensemble method was assessed using a cross-validation procedure, with six groups dedicated to training, one group for validation, and one group exclusively taken as a test set for the final evaluation of the ensemble. The performance of the neural network was evaluated using accuracy, F1 score, sensitivity, and specificity. The U-Net neural network achieved an accuracy of 93.1%, sensitivity of 65.1%, specificity of 95.9%, and an F1 score of 63.0%.

conclusionsThe U-Net neural network using the ensemble strategy was able to automatically identify visually detectable dental biofilms on intraoral photographs. The application of this new knowledge will soon be available in clinical practice.

Indexed as

BiofilmsDeep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39954282
PMCPMC11972646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.