ArticleMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2025
Certainty of evidence on the effects of cryotherapy, surgical wound closure, and chlorhexidine on clinical and patient-centered outcomes after third molar surgery: evidence mapping of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Article in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of topical vacuum assisted drainage in mandibular third molar surgeries: a randomized controlled clinical study.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRemoval of third molars often leads to complications such as pain, swelling, and trismus, impacting patient quality of life. Various strategies including cryotherapy, different suture techniques, and chlorhexidine are employed to mitigate these effects. However, the effectiveness of these interventions is still debated, as clinical trials present inconsistent and contrasting results. This study aims to assess the certainty of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses regarding the effects of these interventions on clinical outcomes and patient quality of life following third molar surgery. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis evidence mapping followed the Global Evidence Mapping Initiative and PRISMA guidelines, utilizing databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar until February 2024. Methodological quality was assessed via AMSTAR-2 and the effects of these interventions on outcomes of interest were classified as "beneficial", "probably beneficial", "harmful", "no effect", or "inconclusive". Findings were mapped using the PyMeta platform.
resultsThirteen studies were reviewed. All systematic reviews evaluated the effects of these interventions on clinical outcomes following third molar surgery, but none assessed the impact on patient quality of life. Cryotherapy was classified as probably beneficial for reducing pain and swelling within the first 72 hours post-surgery. Secondary surgical wound closure was effective in reducing pain, swelling, and trismus during the first postoperative week, but it did not mitigate the risk of bleeding, infection, or alveolitis. Chlorhexidine, especially when used as a mouthwash, is effective in preventing postoperative alveolitis. However, most reviews (76.9%) were rated as "critically low" methodological quality.
conclusionsAlthough the potential benefits of cryotherapy, secondary surgical wound closure, and chlorhexidine on clinical outcomes, this study revealed a predominantly low quality of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Moreover, further research should expand investigations into the patient-centered outcomes to better guide clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.