ArticleFamily medicine2025
Best Practices for Early Intervention and Remediation of Residents in Family Medicine: Insights From an Interdisciplinary Delphi Study.
Article in Family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Intervention and Remediation in Family Medicine Residencies: Behavioral Science Faculty Ratings of the Integration of Consensus-Based Recommendations.Family medicine · 2026Article
- Where Lines Get Blurred: Quiet Quitting, Burnout, and Beyond.Family medicine · 2026Article
- FEAR: Faculty Evaluation and Retaliation-A Survey of Family Medicine Program Directors.Family medicine · 2026Article
- Remediation strategies for the struggling resident: technical skills and beyond.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRemediation and early intervention for family medicine residents who experience performance problems represent a challenge for programs, faculty, and residents. Some evidence suggests that identifying those at risk for performance problems and providing support early may prevent more serious issues later in residency.
objectivesWe wanted to explore the perspectives of content experts to identify best practices for early intervention and remediation to address common challenges and create a framework for more effective and inclusive early intervention and remediation.
methodsWe used a Delphi approach to identify themes and best practices for early intervention and remediation, including qualitative interviews, identification of themes, clarification of essential practices, and confirmation of agreement with core medical faculty.
resultsOur qualitative interviews and Delphi methodology identified best practices in five main categories: (a) early assessment and identification, (b) feedback, (c) resident engagement, (d) intervention strategies and resources, and (e) documentation. From an initial pool of 38 recommendations, we identified a final group of 11 practices that generated broad agreement among behavioral science faculty and core medical faculty.
conclusionsKey principles for early intervention and remediation include early skill assessment, data-driven feedback, collaborative processes, diverse resources, clear documentation, and faculty training for providing actionable feedback. While our Delphi study provided in-depth insights into various programs' practices, it may not capture unique practices across all programs. Future research on early intervention and remediation should explore current practices, aiming for specific, collaborative, and transparent processes, with insights from experienced faculty, to enhance equity and effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.