Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39954230›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2025

Postinterventional fetal aortic regurgitation: prevalence, outcome and effects on fetal circulation in large single-center cohort.

A Tulzer, J Hochpoechler, I Scharnreitner, V Tomek, R Weber, E Sames-Dolzer, M Kreuzer, R Mair, R Mair, G Tulzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Current practice and challenges in fetal cardiac intervention.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

A Tulzer *Children's Heart Center Linz, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4034-7987
J Hochpoechler *Children's Heart Center Linz, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
I ScharnreitnerMedical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.
V TomekChildren's Heart Center, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
R WeberPediatric Heart Center Zurich, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
E Sames-DolzerMedical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.
M KreuzerMedical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.
R MairMedical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.
R MairMedical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.
G TulzerChildren's Heart Center Linz, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0473-0257

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyze the prevalence and severity of fetal aortic regurgitation (AR) after undergoing successful fetal aortic valvuloplasty (FAV) and to evaluate its effects on fetal circulation and left ventricular (LV) growth.

methodsThis was a retrospective review of all fetuses with critical aortic stenosis who underwent successful FAV at our center between 2010 and 2024 for whom postnatal echocardiograms were available in digital format. Fetal and postnatal echocardiographic examinations were analyzed for ventricular and valvular dimensions and characteristics, and Z-scores were calculated for middle cerebral artery (MCA) pulsatility index (PI), umbilical artery (UA) PI and cerebroplacental ratio. AR severity was classified into no/mild AR or significant (moderate/severe) AR. The balloon-to-aortic valve ratio (BVR) was calculated as the ratio between the maximum actual balloon diameter and the aortic valve (AV) annulus diameter. The primary endpoints of this study were the prevalence, severity and risk factors for fetal AR following successful FAV.

resultsNinety-nine fetuses who underwent successful FAV were included. Immediate post-FAV echocardiograms showed that 87% of fetuses developed some degree of AR, including 45% of all fetuses with significant AR. BVR was significantly higher in fetuses with significant AR compared to those with no/mild AR (mean, 1.09 (95% CI, 1.06-1.12) vs 1.02 (95% CI, 0.99-1.04); P < 0.001). In a subgroup of 66/99 fetuses with available postnatal echocardiograms, the prevalence of AR decreased significantly from 86% before birth to 58% after birth (P < 0.001), with the proportion of fetuses with significant AR reducing from 47% before birth to 17% after birth (P < 0.001). In the overall cohort of fetuses, AV maximum velocity (Vmax) increased significantly from post-FAV to after birth (mean, 1.93 (95% CI, 1.75-2.11) m/s vs 3.21 (95% CI, 2.89-3.55) m/s; P < 0.001), regardless of AR severity, but Vmax after birth was lower in the significant-AR group compared with the no/mild-AR group (mean, 2.85 m/s vs 3.55 m/s; P = 0.020). Fetuses with significant AR exhibited higher relative LV length increases from immediately post-FAV to after birth than did those with no/mild AR (25% (95% CI, 16-33%) vs 14% (95% CI, 6-21%); P = 0.044), although there was no significant difference in mean LV length Z-score after birth between the two groups. FAV led to significant short-term increases in MCA-PI and UA-PI Z-scores, with greater increases observed in fetuses with significant AR.

conclusionsFAV is associated with a high prevalence of fetal AR, which lessens in severity over the course of gestation. Significant fetal AR had the largest association with greater BVR and had significant impact on fetal hemodynamics. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve InsufficiencyAortic Valve StenosisBalloon ValvuloplastyFetal DiseasesFetal HeartAdultAortic ValveEchocardiographyFemaleHumansPregnancyPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment Outcomeaortic regurgitationcritical aortic stenosisevolving hypoplastic left heart syndromefetal cardiac interventionfetal circulation

Identifiers

PMID39954230
PMCPMC11872343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.