Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39954224›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2025

Pharmacy-led interventions to reverse and prevent prescribing cascades in primary care: a proof-of-concept study.

Atiya K Mohammad, Jacqueline G Hugtenburg, Yildiz Ceylan, Marcel Kooij, Saskia Knies, Patricia M L A van den Bemt, Petra Denig, Fatma Karapinar-Carkıt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Real-World Complexity of Prescribing Cascades.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Atiya K MohammadDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline G HugtenburgDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yildiz CeylanCommunity Pharmacy, Benu Apotheek Wester, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel KooijCommunity Pharmacy, Service Apotheek Koning, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Saskia KniesThe National Health Care Institute (Zorginstituut Nederland), Diemen, The Netherlands.
Patricia M L A van den BemtDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Petra DenigDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Fatma Karapinar-CarkıtDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. f.karapinar@mumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3077-9663

Funding

Zorginstituut Nederland OP1294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescribing cascades occur in clinical practice when a medication causes an adverse drug reaction (ADR), which is addressed by prescribing additional medication.

aimThe aim was to provide proof-of-concept for pharmacy-led interventions to reverse or prevent prescribing cascades.

methodTwo community pharmacies each tested two approaches. To reverse prescribing cascades, ten cascades were selected from literature. Dispensing records were screened to identify patients with these cascades. To prevent prescribing cascades, patients who started medications associated with five of these cascades were telephoned one month after their first dispensing to discuss ADRs. Pharmacists assessed the need to intervene together with prescribers. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a treatment change initiated. Secondary outcomes were time investment, potential cost-savings, and pharmacists' experiences.

resultsTo reverse prescribing cascades, 24 patients were included. For eight the prescriber was consulted, resulting in the reversal of three cascades. Forty-four patients were included to prevent prescribing cascades. Six of them experienced an ADR that could lead to a prescribing cascade. For two patients interventions were conducted to prevent this. The estimated time investment to identify patients possibly in need of intervention was 4.5 h for the reversing approach and 4.8 h for the preventing approach, while follow-up actions required 1.8 h and 0.5 h, respectively. Both approaches could be cost-saving. Pharmacists considered both approaches relevant but identified a knowledge gap on how to intervene for some cascades.

conclusionPharmacy-led interventions may reverse and prevent prescribing cascades, but more efficient screening methods and tools are needed before further implementation.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacistsPractice Patterns, Pharmacists'Primary Health CareAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProfessional RoleProof of Concept StudyAdverse drug reactionsCommunity pharmacy servicePharmacotherapyPharmacy researchPrescribing cascades

Identifiers

PMID39954224
PMCPMC12125053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.