Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39954212›Full record

ArticleBioresources and bioprocessing2025

Antibacterial and physicomechanical properties of cellulosic nonwovens functionalized with chitosan: a study on interaction effects of influencing factors and assessment methods.

Esubalew Kasaw Gebeyehu, Rekha Shresth, Tonmoy Saha, Jenni Tienaho, Ulla Jauhiainen, Ali Amin Tarhini, Ali Reza Tehrani-Bagha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioresources and bioprocessing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Esubalew Kasaw GebeyehuDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University, Vuorimiehentie 1, 02150, Espoo, Finland.
Rekha ShresthDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University, Vuorimiehentie 1, 02150, Espoo, Finland.
Tonmoy SahaDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University, Vuorimiehentie 1, 02150, Espoo, Finland.
Jenni TienahoNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
Ulla JauhiainenNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
Ali Amin TarhiniDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University, Vuorimiehentie 1, 02150, Espoo, Finland. ali.tarhini@aalto.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0317-4802
Ali Reza Tehrani-BaghaDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University, Vuorimiehentie 1, 02150, Espoo, Finland. ali.tehrani@aalto.fi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing demand for antimicrobial textiles and environmental concerns over synthetic agents have driven interest in biobased agents like chitosan, an eco-friendly alternative reported with variable effectiveness on textiles. This research investigates the effects of chitosan's molecular weight, concentration, treatment method, and their interaction effects on the antibacterial and physicomechanical properties of cellulosic nonwovens. The role of culture medium dynamics in antibacterial testing was also examined. Chitosan with low (30 kDa), medium (250 kDa) and high (2100 kDa) molecular weights at concentrations of 1 to 15 g/L was applied using pad-dry and dip-dry methods, with dip coating resulting in higher chitosan deposition. Antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli (E. coli) was assessed using three methods: agar diffusion, a luminescent bacterial biosensor assay, and log reduction of colony-forming units (CFU/mL) in a time-kill test. While the first two test methods showed no antibacterial effect, CFU/mL revealed significant activity with interaction effects showing that the dip-coated, 30 kDa chitosan above a concentration of 5 g/L achieved complete bacterial reduction. The enhanced antibacterial performance of chitosan-coated cellulosic substrates, compared to chitosan in a culture medium, highlighted the role of cellulosic nonwoven in boosting antibacterial effectiveness, likely through improved contact and interaction with bacterial cells. The study demonstrated that chitosan-treated cellulosic nonwovens, particularly with dip-dry coating altered tensile strength and increased the bending resistance and bending stiffness.

Indexed as

Absorption and diffusion testAntibacterial activityCellulosic nonwovenChitosanCulture medium dynamicsPhysio-mechanical properties

Identifiers

PMID39954212
PMCPMC11829891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.