ArticleInfection2025
Microbiological diversity among patients with Lemierre syndrome and clinical implications: an individual patient-level analysis.
Article in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Infections Caused by Fusobacterium Species: Microbiology, Clinical Syndromes and Management: A Narrative Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Review
- Meeting the future at the Munich conference ESCMID-Global 2026.Infection · 2026Article
- Lemierre syndrome making an encore in the post-antibiotic era: A case report.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Lemierre syndrome.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Unmasking Rarity: An Atypical Presentation of Lemierre's Syndrome.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Atypical Lemierre syndrome with thrombophlebitis of the external jugular vein: A case report.IDCases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLemierre syndrome is a rare condition traditionally defined by bacterial infection of the head/neck region, local thrombophlebitis, and septic embolism. Although in most cases Fusobacterium necrophorum is isolated, it is questionable whether the presence of this microbe is mandatory for diagnosis. In this study, we investigated microorganisms isolated in cases of Lemierre syndrome and their association with demographical and clinical features.
methodsWe conducted an analysis of individual patient data from 712 patients diagnosed with Lemierre syndrome. Demographics, clinical presentation, treatment strategies, and outcomes according to different pathogens were evaluated.
resultsAmong a total of 712 patients, in 574 cases bacterial growth was detected. In 415 patients Fusobacterium spp. was isolated, in 108 either Streptococcus spp. or Staphylococcus spp., and in 51 other bacteria. Patients with different bacteria differed markedly in age, site of preceding infections, clinical presentation, and treatment. Fusobacterium spp. was typically isolated in younger patients (69% of patients aged 16 to 30 years) while Streptococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp. were more prevalent in older subjects (30% of patients aged over 45 years). Of all cases with Fusobacterium spp., 63% had a thrombosis of the internal jugular vein and 91% septic embolism, compared with 94% and 69%, respectively, in cases with Streptococcus spp. or Staphylococcus spp.
conclusionIn contrast to the available literature, our study suggests that Lemierre syndrome may be caused by multiple bacterial species, and that the clinical presentation and course may vary according to the specific bacterial species involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.