Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39954206›Full record

SynthesisCurrent oncology reports2025

Epidemiology of cancer in older adults: a systematic review of age-related differences in solid malignancies treatment.

Esther Bastiaannet, Sophie Pilleron

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Age and sex differences in the global cancer burden.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Esther BastiaannetEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, CH-8001, Zurich, Switzerland. esther.bastiaannet@uzh.ch.
Sophie PilleronAgeing, Cancer, and Disparities Research Unit, Department of Precision Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 1A-B, Rue Thomas Edison, 1445, Strassen, Luxembourg.

Funding

SP is supported by the Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR) Project n°16731054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe examined the latest epidemiological research on age-related differences in cancer treatment and selected outcomes, among patients with cancer aged 60 and above in comparison to younger patients. RECENT

findingsColorectal, pancreatic and lung cancers were studied most often. Most studies were conducted in Europe or the United States of America (USA) within single centers. For unselected patients, older patients receive less treatment, and their survival, regardless of the metric used (cancer-specific survival or overall survival), was poorer than that of middle-aged patients. Age-related differences in treatment and outcomes were more pronounced in patients aged over 80 years. However, among patients selected for treatment, complications, adverse events rates and survival probabilities were comparable between older and younger patients. Treatment differences, especially the omission of therapy, were often smaller for good prognosis cancer types. The likelihood of receiving treatment decreased as age increases, regardless of the cancer types, treatment, countries and setting. More research on treatment in older patients with cancer, especially the frailest and the oldest, is urgently needed as there is still a lack of data to tailor treatment.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsHumansMiddle AgedUnited StatesAgingEpidemiologyOutcomesTherapy

Identifiers

PMID39954206
PMCPMC11958457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.