SynthesisInflammopharmacology2025
Efficacy and safety of mirikizumab in psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Inflammopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMirikizumab, an interleukin-23 (IL-23) p19 subunit inhibitor, has emerged as a promising treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Despite its promising results, a comprehensive synthesis of clinical data is essential to assess its overall efficacy and safety profile.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies assessing mirikizumab in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. A random-effects model using Inverse Variance (IV) computed mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for binary endpoints. Risk Difference (RD) studies were analysed using generic inverse variance (GIV) in Review Manager. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software version 4.2.1, following PRISMA guidelines.
resultsThis analysis of three RCTs involving 1,649 adult patients over 16-52 weeks demonstrated mirikizumab's significant efficacy in treating psoriasis. At 16 weeks, mirikizumab substantially reduced Body Surface Area (BSA) to < 1% (RR: 34.53, p < 0.001) and improved PASI scores (PASI 100 RR: 25.94, PASI 90 RR: 11.50, PASI 75 RR: 10.47, all p < 0.001). Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) scores of 0/1 were achieved (RR: 12.48, p < 0.001). Quality of life measures also improved significantly, with increases in SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Summaries (MD: 4.02 and 3.53 respectively, p < 0.01) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores of 0/1 (RD: 0.51, p < 0.00001). Importantly, the safety profile of mirikizumab was comparable to the control, with no significant differences in the overall incidence of adverse effects (RR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.86-1.10) or in serious adverse effects (RR: 1.61; 95% CI: 0.55-4.73). These results collectively demonstrate the efficacy and safety of mirikizumab in treating psoriasis, with significant improvements across multiple clinical and quality-of-life measures.
conclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrates that mirikizumab significantly reduces psoriasis severity and improves quality of life, with a favourable safety profile. These findings support its use as a valuable treatment option for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Further research is needed to assess long-term outcomes and comparative effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39954188What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.