Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39954186›Full record

ArticleMarine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)2025

Lipid- and Multivariate-Based Analyses to Determine Cell Response to pH Variations and Buffer Composition.

Ricardo F S Pereira, Carla C C R de Carvalho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ricardo F S PereiraiBB-Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9722-1931
Carla C C R de CarvalhoiBB-Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001, Lisbon, Portugal. ccarvalho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8142-3835

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/04565/2020 and UIDP/04565/2020; LA/P/0140/2020Horizon 2020 grant agreement no. 101000327 (Project FuturEnzyme)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During marine bioprocess development, pH control is of paramount importance. In shake flasks, aerobic fermentations usually have no pH control except from the buffering effect provided by buffers in the medium. However, the use of traditional buffers, such as phosphate buffer, can lead to the precipitation of medium components. Good's buffers may be a sound alternative. Using Serratia rubidaea cells and their production of prodigiosin as model system, several Good's buffers were tested and compared to phosphate buffer. Lipidomics analysis in conjugation with statistical multivariate analysis was performed to determine the cellular response to pH variations and buffer composition. Biomass productivity was similar when using the different buffers, but prodigiosin production was highly influenced and was highest with MES buffer at pH 5.5, reaching 249.8 mg/L, which corresponds to 43.7 mg/g

Indexed as

BioreactorsSerratiaBuffersHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationHydrothermal VentsLipid MetabolismLipidomicsLipidsMultivariate AnalysisPhosphatesProdigiosinBuffersLipidsPhosphatesProdigiosinBiological buffer, ProdigiosinMarine mediumMultivariate statistical analysispHPhosphate buffer

Identifiers

PMID39954186
PMCPMC11829930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.