Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39954182›Full record

ArticleBrain informatics2025

Harnessing the synergy of statistics and deep learning for BCI competition 4 dataset 4: a novel approach.

Gauttam Jangir, Nisheeth Joshi, Gaurav Purohit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gauttam JangirBanasthali Vidyapith, Tonk, India. gauttamj49@gmail.com.
Nisheeth JoshiBanasthali Vidyapith, Tonk, India.
Gaurav PurohitCentral Electronics Engineering Research Institute, Pilāni, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human brain signal processing and finger's movement coordination is a complex mechanism. In this mechanism finger's movement is mostly performed for every day's task. It is well known that to capture such movement EEG or ECoG signals are used. In this order to find the patterns from these signals is important. The BCI competition 4 dataset 4 is one such standard dataset of ECoG signals for individual finger movement provided by University of Washington, USA. In this work, this dataset is, statistically analyzed to understand the nature of data and outliers in it. Effectiveness of pre-processing algorithm is then visualized. The cleaned dataset has dual polarity and gaussian distribution nature which makes Tanh activation function suitable for the neural network BC4D4 model. BC4D4 uses Convolutional neural network for feature extraction, dense neural network for pattern identification and incorporating dropout & regularization making the proposed model more resilient. Our model outperforms the state of the art work on the dataset 4 achieving 0.85 correlation value that is 1.85X (Winner of BCI competition 4, 2012) & 1.25X (Finger Flex model, 2022).

Indexed as

BCI (Brain Computer Interface)EEG (electroencephalogram)Electrocorticography (ECoG)Event Related Potential (ERP)Motor Imagery (MI)Visual Evoked Potential (VEP)

Identifiers

PMID39954182
PMCPMC11829870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.