Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39954181›Full record

ArticleMolecular diversity2025

Machine learning and cheminformatics-based Identification of lichen-derived compounds targeting mutant PBP4

Shalini Mathpal, Tushar Joshi, P Priyamvada, Sudha Ramaiah, Anand Anbarasu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Network analysis of antimicrobial resistance inNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shalini MathpalMedical and Biological Computing Laboratory, School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India.
Tushar JoshiMedical and Biological Computing Laboratory, School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India.
P PriyamvadaMedical and Biological Computing Laboratory, School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India.
Sudha RamaiahMedical and Biological Computing Laboratory, School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India. sudhaanand@vit.ac.in.
Anand AnbarasuMedical and Biological Computing Laboratory, School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India.

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research IRIS ID: 2021-11889; AMR/Adhoc/290/2022-ECD-II
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penicillin-binding protein 4 (PBP4) is essential in imparting significant β-lactam antibiotics resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and the mutation R200L in PBP4 is linked to β-lactam non-susceptibility in natural strains, complicating treatment options. Therefore, discovering novel therapeutics against the mutant PBP4 is crucial, and natural compounds from lichen have found relevance in this regard. The aim of our study was to identify novel inhibitors against the R200L mutation by applying machine learning (ML) approach. Predictive classification models were developed using six machine learning algorithms to categorize lichen-derived compounds as either active or inactive. The models were evaluated using ROC curves, confusion matrices, and relevant statistical parameters. Among these, the Extra Trees algorithm showed superior predictive accuracy at 81%. The model identified 115 potentially active compounds from lichen, which were further evaluated for drug-likeness and structural similarity to β-lactam antibiotics. The top 23 compounds, showing similarity to β-lactam drug, were subjected to molecular docking. Among the top 10 compounds, two compounds, Barbatolic acid and Orcinyl lecanorate, displayed promising results in 200 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and MM-PBSA analysis, exhibiting better docking score compare to reference compound. Additionally, DFT calculations revealed negative binding energies and smaller HOMO-LUMO gaps for both compounds. The obtained results prove the utility of ML in screening natural compounds, and provide novel opportunities for the design of antimicrobial compounds in the future.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCheminformaticsLichensMachine LearningPenicillin-Binding ProteinsStaphylococcus aureusMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutationAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsPenicillin-Binding ProteinsLichenMachine learningMD simulationsMolecular dockingPBP4Staphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.