ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Finger-like protrusions in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas: implications for recurrence and prognosis following complete tumor resection and predictive factors.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extent of resection and craniopharyngioma recurrence: a volumetric analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Laser microdissection-based multi-omics integration unveils the pathological atlas and tumor differentiation network of adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2026Article
- The Evolving Role of the Endoscopic Endonasal Transplanum-Transtuberculum Approach in the Management of Craniopharyngiomas: A Systematic Review of Outcomes, Reconstruction, and Surgical Evolution.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- History before diagnosis in adult-onset craniopharyngioma: associations with initial presentation and long-term prognosis: a retrospective cohort study of 151 patients.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Spatially Resolved Multiomics Reveals Metabolic Remodeling and Autophagy Activation in Adamantinomatous Craniopharyngiomas.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Endonasal endoscopic surgery for residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas: A propensity score-matched cohort study.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Multiomics reveals the mechanism of KNG1 in promoting tumor progression in adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Hypothalamic obesity following craniopharyngioma surgery: What is the role of hypothalamic T2 signal changes in brain MRI?Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Finger-like protrusions (FPs) extending into the hypothalamus in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas (ACPs) pose surgical challenges and their link to tumor recurrence and patient prognosis following gross total resection (GTR) is unclear. This study aims to determine the association between FPs, tumor recurrence, and prognosis after GTR, while identifying predictors for the presence of FPs. A total of 149 ACP patients undergoing GTR at our institution between January 2015 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed and were categorized into FP and non-FP groups based on the histology of the interface between ACP and the hypothalamus. Various parameters were compared, and logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors for the presence of FPs in ACPs. The FP group (n = 50) had higher rates of meningitis (p = 0.020), postoperative hydrocephalus (p = 0.014), pneumonia (p < 0.001), perioperative mortality (p = 0.036), radiological hypothalamic injury (p < 0.001), and hypothalamic dysfunction (p < 0.001) during follow-up. They also showed inferior recurrence-free survival (p = 0.012) and overall survival (p = 0.023). Predictors for FPs in ACPs included solid tumor (OR 5.28, 95% CI 1.81-15.40; p = 0.002) and preoperative MRI without an upward eagle sign (OR 27.65, 95% CI 8.93-85.65; p < 0.001). FPs in ACPs pose challenges for achieving safe radical tumor resection and are linked to higher recurrence rates and unfavorable patient outcomes after GTR. Solid tumor consistency and preoperative MRI without an upward eagle sign could predict the presence of FPs in ACPs involving the hypothalamus. For ACPs demonstrating these characteristics, a more conservative resection should be considered. Additionally, rigorous postoperative monitoring for tumor recurrence is essential for ACPs with FPs, even after GTR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39954160What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.