Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39954148›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2025

Neurosurgical management of brain metastases in the elderly: a prospective study on adverse event prevalence and predictors.

Pavlina Lenga, Moritz Scherer, Helena Kleineidam, Andreas Unterberg, Sandro M Krieg, Philip Dao Trong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pavlina LengaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany. pavlina.lenga@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Moritz SchererDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Helena KleineidamDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Andreas UnterbergDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Sandro M KriegDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Philip Dao TrongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of brain metastases (BM) in geriatric patients poses significant challenges in the context of an aging population and advances in systemic cancer treatment. This study provides insights into the prevalence and nature of adverse events (AEs) following intracranial surgery in patients aged 65 years and older. It highlights the complexities and implications of treating this demographic patient population and identifies risk factors associated with AEs. This prospective study includes patients aged 65 years and older with BM who underwent surgery between January 2022 and December 2023. A detailed assessment of AEs, defined as any complication occurring within the first 30 days post-surgery, was conducted. Potential risk factors for the occurrence of AEs were examined. The study encompassed 104 patients, averaging 70.1 ± 2.8 years, with 102 undergoing surgery. The mean age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was 8.9 ± 1.2, indicating a significant comorbidity burden, predominantly cardiac conditions. The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) showed substantial improvement post-surgery, increasing from 71.3% ± 7.8 to 75.1% ± 5.0 (p = 0.045). The average hospital stay was 10.6 days. Four non-surgery-related mortalities occurred within the 30-day postoperative period. Surgery-related AEs included wound complications in two patients, with one necessitating surgical revision. Advanced age and comorbidities emerged as significant predictors of AEs. Our findings suggest that neurosurgical intervention for BM in the elderly is a feasible and safe option, demonstrating favorable morbidity and mortality rates. However, careful postoperative monitoring is crucial, especially considering the baseline health status of these patients, which increases their susceptibility to AEs. Standardizing protocols for AE reporting and analysis is essential for improving clinical outcomes and maintaining the quality of healthcare for this patient population.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeurosurgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansKarnofsky Performance StatusLength of StayMalePrevalenceProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAdverse eventsBrain metastasesClavien-Dindo classification systemOlder age

Identifiers

PMID39954148
PMCPMC11829898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.