ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Neurosurgical management of brain metastases in the elderly: a prospective study on adverse event prevalence and predictors.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Awake craniotomy for brain tumor resection in the elderly: an institutional experience.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes and survival benefits of craniotomy in breast cancer patients with brain metastases: Focusing on candidate selection and early mortality.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Management of brain metastases in older adults with non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Early versus delayed postoperative extubation after elective neurosurgical treatment of brain metastasis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Surgical Management of Brain Metastases in Patients Aged 80 and Above: Observations From a Limited Case Series.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of brain metastases (BM) in geriatric patients poses significant challenges in the context of an aging population and advances in systemic cancer treatment. This study provides insights into the prevalence and nature of adverse events (AEs) following intracranial surgery in patients aged 65 years and older. It highlights the complexities and implications of treating this demographic patient population and identifies risk factors associated with AEs. This prospective study includes patients aged 65 years and older with BM who underwent surgery between January 2022 and December 2023. A detailed assessment of AEs, defined as any complication occurring within the first 30 days post-surgery, was conducted. Potential risk factors for the occurrence of AEs were examined. The study encompassed 104 patients, averaging 70.1 ± 2.8 years, with 102 undergoing surgery. The mean age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was 8.9 ± 1.2, indicating a significant comorbidity burden, predominantly cardiac conditions. The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) showed substantial improvement post-surgery, increasing from 71.3% ± 7.8 to 75.1% ± 5.0 (p = 0.045). The average hospital stay was 10.6 days. Four non-surgery-related mortalities occurred within the 30-day postoperative period. Surgery-related AEs included wound complications in two patients, with one necessitating surgical revision. Advanced age and comorbidities emerged as significant predictors of AEs. Our findings suggest that neurosurgical intervention for BM in the elderly is a feasible and safe option, demonstrating favorable morbidity and mortality rates. However, careful postoperative monitoring is crucial, especially considering the baseline health status of these patients, which increases their susceptibility to AEs. Standardizing protocols for AE reporting and analysis is essential for improving clinical outcomes and maintaining the quality of healthcare for this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.