ArticleMycorrhiza2025
Bacterial community in the hyphosphere of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus differs from that in the surrounding environment and is influenced by hyphal disruption.
Article in Mycorrhiza, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Soil to Cytoplasm: The Mycorrhizal Phosphorus Express and Its Regulatory Steps.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacterial composition and functions in the hyphosphere of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are complex because AM fungal hyphae transport carbon compounds from plant photosynthesis which feed bacteria and act as signaling molecules. This function is lost when hyphae separate from roots, a common occurrence in soil. However, the impact of such disturbances on hyphal surface bacteria remains unclear. We used in vitro bi-compartmented Petri plates with carrot roots and the AM fungus Rhizophagus irregularis MUCL 43194, separating root and hyphal compartments. Treatments included hyphae connected to roots (+ AM), no hyphae (-AM), and hyphae cut at different times (C3D and C0D, where C3D indicates hyphae cut 3 days before inoculation and C0D indicates hyphae cut on the day of inoculation) subjected to a bacterial suspension extracted from a field soil. Thirteen bacterial phyla were identified, with Streptomyces, Pseudomonas, Rhodococcus, and Cellulomonas dominating. Hyphae increased bacterial ASV relative abundance, notably enriching Actinobacteria ASVs. After 14 days, α-diversity decreased from -AM to C3D, C0D, and + AM, with fewer Bacteroidetes species in + AM compared to -AM. Root-connected hyphae led to deterministic bacterial assembly, while cut hyphae resulted in stochastic assembly. Our findings show that physical disruption of hyphae significantly affects bacterial diversity and may influence ecological functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39954130What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.