Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39954122›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Bioethical issues in neonatal care: the case of CARPEDIEM.

Claudio Ronco, Zaccaria Ricci

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claudio RoncoInternational Renal Research Institute of Vicenza and IRRIV Foundation, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Zaccaria RicciPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Florence, Italy. zaccaria.ricci@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several barriers determine a lack of technological transfer between adult and pediatric care. In particular, this has been the case in the field of critical care nephrology where adequate devices and machinery for neonatal dialysis were completely missing. Where industry and large hospital centers do not provide sufficient advancement in pediatric and neonatal care, the academic world must take the lead even though in some cases adequate funding or resources are lacking. Then, the role of charity events and non-profit institutions and organizations may represent the correct approach to move the field forward. This has been the case for the development of CARPEDIEM (Cardio, Renal, pediatric, Dialysis, Emergency, Machine), where a combination of charity events and academic effort led to the most modern and unique neonatal dialysis machine. This is a nice example of how technological gaps in neonatal care can be overcome.

Indexed as

Bioethical IssuesRenal DialysisCharitiesHumansInfant, NewbornBioethical issuesExtracorporeal blood purificationNeonatal technologyPediatric careTechnological transfer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.