Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39954116›Full record

SynthesisCNS drugs2025

Maintaining Mobility and Balance in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review Examining Potential Impact of Symptomatic Pharmacotherapy.

Alyssa A Jones, Rudri Purohit, Tanvi Bhatt, Robert W Motl

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CNS drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07202195 (Home-Based Neuromodulation Suits for Reducing Spasticity and Ataxia in Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07202195 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Home-Based Neuromodulation Suits for Reducing Spasticity and Ataxia in Multiple Sclerosis: A Multi-center RCT

TypeinterventionalSponsorDaphne KosRan2026 to 2027Enrolled70ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, MS (Multiple Sclerosis), Spasticity With Multiple Sclerosis, Ataxia - OtherArmselectro-stimulation suit, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alyssa A Jones *Department of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-9562-4984
Rudri Purohit *Department of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4290-0352
Tanvi BhattDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6417-1018
Robert W MotlDepartment of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. robmotl@uic.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5894-2290

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobility disability (MD) manifests as walking dysfunction and postural instability in more than 90% of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) within 10 years of disease onset. Disease-modifying pharmacotherapies reduce rates of relapses and new lesions and slow disease progression, but ongoing decline in MD can persist or result from secondary, symptomatic pharmacotherapies. This systematic review focuses on symptomatic pharmacotherapies that potentially impact markers of MD in MS.

methodsPubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and Scopus were searched between January 1990 and December 2024. Eligible studies were included on the basis of the following criteria: (1) randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs); (2) confirmed MS diagnosis; (3) one MD-related outcome; and (4) one symptomatic pharmacotherapy; OR (5) multiple doses of a symptomatic pharmacotherapy. Results were uploaded to Rayyan: Intelligent Systematic Review software and screened by two blinded reviewers for eligibility. Risk of bias was assessed using the PEDRo Scale for quality assessment.

resultsThis review included 23 RCTs (all RCTs scored good-to-excellent on PEDRo Scale); 13 RCTs examined fampridine (4-aminopyridine) for its direct effects on MD, and 10 RCTs assessed indirect effects of symptomatic pharmacotherapies, including cannabinoids (n = 9), and baclofen (n = 1) on MD. The MD outcomes included gait (25-foot walk [T25FW], kinetics, and kinematics), community mobility (12-item MS Walking Scale [MSWS-12]), endurance (6-min walk [6MW]), balance (Berg Balance Scale [BBS], Dynamic Gait Index [DGI], Six-Spot Step Test, posturography, and falls), and functional mobility (Timed Up and Go [TUG] and 5 Times Sit-to-Stand [5STS]). Fampridine significantly improved gait (T25FW, MSWS-12), endurance (6MW), and functional mobility (5STS, TUG), with the largest effect on gait speed; changes in balance were inconclusive. Indirect pharmacotherapies, specifically cannabinoids mainly reduced spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale, nine out of nine studies), but rarely improved pain (Numerical Rating Scale, two out of nine studies) or MD outcomes (two out of nine studies). Both direct and indirect pharmacotherapies resulted in adverse effects, notably dizziness (n = 366), urinary tract infection (n = 216), and nausea (n = 150), potentially impacting MD in MS.

conclusionsFampridine may improve gait and functional mobility in MS, but its effect on balance requires further investigation in RCTs. Cannabinoids and baclofen may alleviate spasticity and pain, but seemingly have limited secondary effect on markers of MD, such as gait and postural stability. Clinicians should consider the impact of symptomatic pharmacotherapies on MD in MS, including potential side effects. Future research should explore integrating rehabilitation (e.g., balance training) with symptomatic pharmacotherapies, as this might enhance positive effects or combat deleterious effects on markers of MD.

Indexed as

Mobility LimitationMultiple SclerosisPostural Balance4-AminopyridineHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic4-Aminopyridine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.